On 4/10/2021 1:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I propose that we just clarify this in the docs we'll write for TypeGuard.
I agree. When I reviewed the PEP, my concern was not with 'TypeGuard'
itself, once I understood more or less what it means, but with the
explanation in the PEP.
--
Terr
I propose that we just clarify this in the docs we'll write for TypeGuard.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 8:33 AM Eric Traut wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the note. Apologies for the slow reply — your email got trapped
> in Microsoft’s spam filters, and I just noticed it.
>
>
>
> The idea of us
Hi Barry,
Thanks for the note. Apologies for the slow reply — your email got trapped in
Microsoft’s spam filters, and I just noticed it.
The idea of using a wrapper type was my first thought too. In fact, I
implemented that solution in prototype form. It was disliked by almost everyone
who tri
