On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:56 PM Greg Ewing
wrote:
> While we're talking about compelling use cases, does anyone have an
> actual, concrete use case for the proposed "except *" feature that's
> strong enough to justify new syntax?
>
> I'm fine with having ExceptionGroup as a built-in type. I'm not
Hi Greg,
If all you want is to catch an exception group and process it, then except*
does look like overkill.
It gets more interesting if you want to handle only some of the exceptions
and reraise the rest (without adding the current frame to the traceback),
or when the exception handler raises/r
