This now happened. Maybe you can just submit it to the SC for review? Or
did that already happen? (I no longer have any insight into the SC's queue.)
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:40 PM Łukasz Langa wrote:
>
> On 25 Feb 2020, at 16:22, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> Łukasz, do you agree?
>
>
> As long
Ok, thanks for the update!
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2020-03-06 - 2020-03-13)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open7357 ( -2)
closed 44350 (+80)
total 51707 (+78)
Open issues w
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:36 AM Peter Donis wrote:
> Is there any update on this? I have put the setup/teardown code in a context
> manager as Zach recommended. The setup/teardown code covers everything that
> could possibly be mutated by the test. It's probably not the most elegant way
> to do
Is there any update on this? I have put the setup/teardown code in a context
manager as Zach recommended. The setup/teardown code covers everything that
could possibly be mutated by the test. It's probably not the most elegant way
to do it, but all of the tests pass which indicates that it works
