Happy to help.
Since it doesn't seem like anybody has issues with the PEP, and the PR looks
solid, I think I'll contact the Steering Council about moving this forward.
Brandt
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an e
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 05:35:38PM -, Brandt Bucher wrote:
> > I am accepting this PEP. Congratulations Steven and Brandt!
>
> Thank you for your guidance, especially the suggestions late last
> year. And thanks Steven for taking me on as a co-author and shaping
> the bulk of the proposal.
> we'll also want to look at collections.UserDict, collections.ChainMap, and
> types.MappingProxyType.
UserDict has already been updated in the PR (it has tests that fail if it
doesn't have all of dict's methods). I'll look into the others... thanks for
reminding me!
> collections.Mapping and
On Wed., 19 Feb. 2020, 5:07 pm Brandt Bucher,
wrote:
> PEP 614 has recently completed a round of review on Python-Ideas:
>
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0614/
>
> It proposes that the current decorator syntax restrictions be relaxed to
> allow any valid expression. Nobody has raised any o
This looks like a nice usability improvement to me.
My only suggestion would be that types.MappingProxyType be included on the
list of types to be updated.
Cheers,
Nick.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
On Sun., 23 Feb. 2020, 5:32 am Brandt Bucher,
wrote:
> Just to follow up on this, here are the subclasses I've found.
>
> Should be updated:
> - collections.OrderedDict
> - collections.defaultdict
> - http.cookies.BaseCookie
> - http.cookies.Morsel
> - http.cookies.SimpleCookie
>
They're not dic
Just to follow up on this, here are the subclasses I've found.
Should be updated:
- collections.OrderedDict
- collections.defaultdict
- http.cookies.BaseCookie
- http.cookies.Morsel
- http.cookies.SimpleCookie
Don’t think so:
- typing.TypedDict
Already defines the operator:
- collections.Counter
