On 02/05, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Feb 5, 2019, at 02:24, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
You’re welcome! I just pushed an update to add 3.8.0a1 to the set of Python’s
(including git head). Do you think there’s a better way to publicize these
images?
I know that Julien Palard wanted a docker image wi
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:37 PM Steve Dower wrote:
> I also haven't reviewed the changes yet, but provided nobody is strongly
> opposed to taking on a supported platform (without additional releases
> on python.org), I expect I'll do a big part of the reviewing then.
I'm all for the first two chan
Just confirming for the list that I'm aware of this and supportive, but
am not the dedicated support for this effort.
I also haven't reviewed the changes yet, but provided nobody is strongly
opposed to taking on a supported platform (without additional releases
on python.org), I expect I'll do a b
Hi Python Developers,
I'm Paul Monson, I've spent about 20 years working with embedded software.
Since 2010 I've worked for Microsoft as a developer.
Our team is working with CPython on Azure IoT Edge devices that run on
x64-based devices.
We would like to extend that support to Windows
On Feb 5, 2019, at 02:24, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
>
> I was not aware of this image. So it's true that it's very useful.
>
> Thank you very much,
You’re welcome! I just pushed an update to add 3.8.0a1 to the set of Python’s
(including git head). Do you think there’s a better way to publicize
On 2/5/2019 11:44 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I cannot comment on the PR, but since the functionality is
asyncio-specific, I would suggest moving it to a dedicate
`asyncio.testing` module, or something similar, rather than leaving it
in `unittest` proper.
That is one of the options discussed on
On 02/05/2019 11:35 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
How about we stop using a highly public forum to pile up on Davin (being the
subject of a thread like this can be a soul crushing experience).
Thank you for the reminder.
Right now, he could really use some help and support from everyone on
I wrote:
> Could we somehow mark these APIs as experimental in 3.8?
It seems the change "e5ef45b8f519a9be9965590e1a0a587ff584c180" the
one we are discussing. It adds two new files:
Lib/multiprocessing/shared_memory.py
Modules/_multiprocessing/posixshmem.c
It doesn't introduce new C APIs. S
> On Feb 5, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
>
> The main problem I have with this PR is that it seems to introduce 8 brand
> new APIs, but since there is no doc, docstrings or tests it's unclear which
> ones are supposed to be used, how or whether they are supposed to supersede
>
On 2019-02-05, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
> The main problem I have with this PR is that it seems to introduce
> 8 brand new APIs, but since there is no doc, docstrings or tests
> it's unclear which ones are supposed to be used, how or whether
> they are supposed to supersede or deprecate older (slow
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:21 AM Davin Potts <
python+python_...@discontinuity.net> wrote:
> I am attempting to do the right thing and am following the advice of other
> core devs in what I have done thus far.
>
> Borrowing heavily from what I've added to issue35813 just now:
>
> This work is the re
Hi David,
I cannot comment on the PR, but since the functionality is
asyncio-specific, I would suggest moving it to a dedicate
`asyncio.testing` module, or something similar, rather than leaving it
in `unittest` proper.
Regards
Antoine.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 07:05:05 -0500
David Shawley wrote:
Hi everyone, I added a PR to add a sub-class of unittest.TestCase that makes it
possible to write async test methods. I wrote this a few months ago and it is
waiting on core review. Is there a core dev that can take up this review? I
would love to have this functionality in the core.
Lukasz
Hi Barry,
I was not aware of this image. So it's true that it's very useful.
Thank you very much,
Stéphane
On 02/04, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Feb 4, 2019, at 05:02, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
Just one idea, we could create a Docker image with this alpha version.
This Docker image could be used
14 matches
Mail list logo
