Hi,
I am working on the release blocker https://bugs.python.org/issue32232. I
tried to apply the patch proposed by Matthias Klose and I found that it
works on Unix but it fails to build on Windows (probably because circular
imports). I tried to add some tests but after some work on the problem and
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:57 PM Lukasz Langa wrote:
>
> > On Apr 2, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:48:46 -0700
> > Lukasz Langa wrote:
> >> Pickle protocol version 4.0 was originally defined back in PEP 3154 and
> shipped as part of Python 3.4 back in 2011.
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:48:46 -0700
> Lukasz Langa wrote:
>> Pickle protocol version 4.0 was originally defined back in PEP 3154 and
>> shipped as part of Python 3.4 back in 2011. Yet it's still not the default.
>
> Because we want pickles
Given that, go ahead and change in master (3.8).
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:13 PM Christian Heimes
wrote:
> On 2018-04-02 22:48, Lukasz Langa wrote:
> > Pickle protocol version 4.0 was originally defined back in PEP 3154 and
> shipped as part of Python 3.4 back in 2011. Yet it's still not the defa
On 2018-04-02 22:48, Lukasz Langa wrote:
> Pickle protocol version 4.0 was originally defined back in PEP 3154 and
> shipped as part of Python 3.4 back in 2011. Yet it's still not the default.
> There's a number of things that would run faster with it like multiprocessing.
>
> This is too late f
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:48:46 -0700
Lukasz Langa wrote:
> Pickle protocol version 4.0 was originally defined back in PEP 3154 and
> shipped as part of Python 3.4 back in 2011. Yet it's still not the default.
Because we want pickles produced with the default to be readable by
earlier Python 3 versi
Pickle protocol version 4.0 was originally defined back in PEP 3154 and shipped
as part of Python 3.4 back in 2011. Yet it's still not the default. There's a
number of things that would run faster with it like multiprocessing.
This is too late for 3.7 which is a shame but can we at least bump it
Heh. The good old manual approach. :-) How bad indeed?
>>> from idlelib import colorizer; colorizer.make_pat()
from idlelib import colorizer; colorizer.make_pat()
'\\b(?PFalse|None|True|and|as|assert|break|class|continue|def|del|elif|else|except|finally|for|from|global|if|import|in|is|lambda|nonlo
On 2018-04-02 05:43, Guido van Rossum wrote:
My question for you: how on earth did you find this?! Speaking of a
needle in a haystack. Did you run some kind of analysis program that
looks for regexprs? (We've received some good reports from someone who
did that looking for possible DoS attacks.
It’s that time again: time to start thinking about the Python Language
Summit! The 2018 summit will be held on Wednesday, May 9, from 10am to
4pm, at the Huntington Convention Center in Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Your
befezzled and befuddled hosts Barry and Larry will once more be behind
the big
10 matches
Mail list logo
