Re: [Python-Dev] Drop support for old unsupported FreeBSD and Linux kernels?

* Victor Stinner: > CPython still has compatibility code for Linux 2.6, whereas the > support of Linux 2.6.x ended in August 2011, longer than 6 years ago. There are still reasonably widely used 2.6 kernels under support, but they have lots of (feature) backports, so maybe they do not need the 2.

Re: [Python-Dev] Positional-only parameters in Python

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Mario Corchero wrote: > OK, if no one has anything against, Pablo and I can start a PEP just for > the ‘/‘ simple syntax (without the argument group part). > Go for it! Note that your target will be Python 3.8. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) ___

Re: [Python-Dev] Unique loader per module

On Jan 05, 2018, at 05:12 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >I think the main reason you're seeing a problem here is because >ResourceReader has currently been designed to be implemented directly >by loaders, rather than being a subcomponent that you can request >*from* a loader. > >If you instead had an in

Re: [Python-Dev] LibreSSL support

On 2018-01-19 15:42, Christian Heimes wrote: > On 2018-01-19 10:43, Steve Holden wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Nathaniel Smith > > wrote: >> >> On Jan 18, 2018 07:34, "Christian Heimes" > > wrote: >> >> On 2018-01-16

Re: [Python-Dev] Positional-only parameters in Python

OK, if no one has anything against, Pablo and I can start a PEP just for the ‘/‘ simple syntax (without the argument group part). On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 at 07:17, Larry Hastings wrote: > > > On 01/19/2018 08:47 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > - proposing the full PEP 547, including the "argument groups