On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Are you testing for refleaks with gui enabled?
Yes; the refleak builders are running on my Gentoo and Windows
workers, both of which (should have, at least) GUI available and
enabled. However, I have caught Xvfb not running properly on the
G
On 6/27/2017 8:39 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2017-06-27 7:33 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
You could make it just a submodule in the test package.
./python -m test.bisect -R 3:3 test_os
I like the idea :-) I proposed a PR which was approved by Yury
Selivanov, and so I just merged it! It me
That's great, Victor. Thanks for all of your work on this.
Eric.
On 6/27/2017 8:39 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2017-06-27 7:33 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
You could make it just a submodule in the test package.
./python -m test.bisect -R 3:3 test_os
I like the idea :-) I proposed a PR w
2017-06-27 7:33 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
> You could make it just a submodule in the test package.
>
> ./python -m test.bisect -R 3:3 test_os
I like the idea :-) I proposed a PR which was approved by Yury
Selivanov, and so I just merged it! It means that you can now play
with "./python -m
Heh, I'm not totally surprised -- I took Python's metaclass design from a
book named Putting Metaclasses to Work, by Ira R. Forman and Scott H.
Danforth (
https://www.amazon.com/Putting-Metaclasses-Work-Ira-Forman/dp/0201433052).
The book describes a custom metaclass extension to C++ supporting
met
Thought this might be interesting for those of us who live deeper in the
language than most – this is the formal proposal to add metaclasses to C++.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0707r0.pdf
Given the differences between Python and C++, it’s obviously got a different
a
Small enhancement: I added Python 3.5 support to blurb with the help
of Serhiy Storchaka ;-)
Victor
2017-06-25 10:33 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:37:46 -0700
> Larry Hastings wrote:
>> On 06/24/2017 09:14 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>> > Not only core developers make PRs f
On 27 June 2017 at 07:49, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 at 01:34 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> So we have to rely on contributors to make the PR
>> merge-ready by themselves... which means spending some time guiding
>> them through the oh-so-exciting steps necessary to add the right
>> Mis
