Re: [Python-Dev] New work-in-progress bisection tool for the Python test suite (in regrtest)

2017-06-26 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
26.06.17 23:37, Victor Stinner пише: 2017-06-26 21:58 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : I don't see why regrtest isn't the right place for this. The current regrest CLI isn't designed for subcommands, and I don't want to "pollute" regrtest with multiple options for bisect. Currently, my script has alre

Re: [Python-Dev] New work-in-progress bisection tool for the Python test suite (in regrtest)

2017-06-26 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 13:38 Victor Stinner wrote: > 2017-06-26 21:58 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : > > I don't see why regrtest isn't the right place for this. > > The current regrest CLI isn't designed for subcommands, and I don't > want to "pollute" regrtest with multiple options for bisect. > Curr

Re: [Python-Dev] Helping contributors with chores (do we have to?)

2017-06-26 Thread Brett Cannon
[It seems to me most of this thread has gone off-topic since it now includes what I consider a sexist comment, complaining about git, and discussing people's credentials in terms of being able to comment on something, I'm basically ignoring everything that came after this email as none of that has

Re: [Python-Dev] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb

2017-06-26 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 14:28 Terry Reedy wrote: > On 6/25/2017 4:09 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Brett Cannon > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017, 11:24 Terry Reedy, > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Python-Dev] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb

2017-06-26 Thread Terry Reedy
On 6/25/2017 4:09 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Brett Cannon > wrote: On Sun, Jun 25, 2017, 11:24 Terry Reedy, mailto:tjre...@udel.edu>> wrote: I was not aware that PRs could be edited via a web UI and have no ide

Re: [Python-Dev] New work-in-progress bisection tool for the Python test suite (in regrtest)

2017-06-26 Thread Victor Stinner
2017-06-26 21:58 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : > I don't see why regrtest isn't the right place for this. The current regrest CLI isn't designed for subcommands, and I don't want to "pollute" regrtest with multiple options for bisect. Currently, my script has already 4 options: haypo@selma$ python3 ~/

Re: [Python-Dev] New work-in-progress bisection tool for the Python test suite (in regrtest)

2017-06-26 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 09:38 Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I updated my bisect_test.py script to simplify its command line: > >https://github.com/haypo/misc/blob/master/python/bisect_test.py > > To debug a reference leak in test_os, now just type: > >$ ./python bisect_test.py -R 3:3 tes

Re: [Python-Dev] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb

2017-06-26 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 at 20:56 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 26 June 2017 at 02:39, Brett Cannon wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017, 23:45 Nick Coghlan, wrote: > >> I was mainly referring to cases where either an initial commit (with a > >> complete NEWS entry) requires follow-up fixes (no NEWS edit > >>

Re: [Python-Dev] New work-in-progress bisection tool for the Python test suite (in regrtest)

2017-06-26 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, I updated my bisect_test.py script to simplify its command line: https://github.com/haypo/misc/blob/master/python/bisect_test.py To debug a reference leak in test_os, now just type: $ ./python bisect_test.py -R 3:3 test_os Example of output: --- (...) Failing tests (1): * test.test_o