On 9 March 2017 at 06:53, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:50:06AM -0500, Barry Warsaw
> wrote:
>
> > > It's also okay to remove much of the content and just leave a
> placeholder.
> > > The historical record w
On 9 March 2017 at 07:58, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5 March 2017 at 17:50, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>>> Late last year I started working on a change to the CPython CLI (*not*
>>> the shared library) to get it to coerce the legacy C lo
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017, at 18:43, Erik wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm looking at stuff proposed over on Python-Ideas, and I'd appreciate
> some pointers as to the basics of how C-level objects are generally
> compared in Python 3.
>
> The issue is related to the performance of PyObject_RichCompare. I got
2017-03-10 0:35 GMT+01:00 Ned Deily :
> I don't know exactly what you mean by an "official GO" but I don't think
> there has been any agreement yet since there hasn't been a specific proposal
> yet to review. I think what *was* agreed is that, in principle, translation
> *sounds* like a good id
Hi.
I'm looking at stuff proposed over on Python-Ideas, and I'd appreciate
some pointers as to the basics of how C-level objects are generally
compared in Python 3.
The issue is related to the performance of PyObject_RichCompare. I got
to the point where I was trying to work out what was the
[catching up on an older thread]
On Feb 27, 2017, at 05:31, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2017-02-25 19:19 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon :
>> It's getting a little hard to tease out what exactly is being asked at this
>> point. Perhaps it's time to move the discussion over to a translation SIG
>> (which proba
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Is this pattern
>
> def foo():
> return bar()
> async def bar():
> await
>
> async def async_main():
> await foo()
>
> considered to be valid?
>
Yes, it is valid.
Hi,
Is this pattern
def foo():
return bar()
async def bar():
await
async def async_main():
await foo()
considered to be valid?
The reason I'm asking is that some code out there likes to accept a
might-be-a-coroutine-funct
