On Fri, 27 May 2016 at 07:50 Vitaly Murashev
wrote:
> Could anyone please clarify whether it is correct in python3.5 to call
> PyImport_AppendInittab() after Py_Initialize()
>
It should be called before as PyImport_AppendInittab() is shorthand for
PyImport_ExtendInittab() and it says to call pri
I know we're all just having fun, but that's probably a rather stressful
welcome to the list. Maybe we can tone down the humor a bit and instead
review the OP's patches?
--Guido (mobile)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.pyth
On 5/29/2016 9:57 AM, jon wrote:
The aspects we want to capture in a name or adjective for these types are:
a) The types have identical implementations or definitions.
b) They are distinct types.
I think “Distinguished Type” or”Cloned Type” best captures these qualities.
I think the following
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
That can't be right. How can you reduce memory usage by more than one
hundred percent? That would mean you have saved more memory than was
originally used and are now using a negative amount of memory.
It emails an order for more RAM to Amazon, who send out
a robot drone
On 05/29/2016 10:53 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:19:05AM +, Artyom Skrobov wrote:
[...]
The motivation for this patch was to enable a memory footprint
optimization, discussed at http://bugs.python.org/issue26415 My
proposed optimization reduces the memory footprint b
