Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Larry Hastings
On 05/17/2016 02:57 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2016, 19:02 Ethan Furman > wrote: Isn't 3.4 now in security-fix mode? Yes, but because of pathlib's provisional status, Guido backported the path attribute from 3.4 forward. I think this is one reas

Re: [Python-Dev] Speeding up CPython 5-10%

2016-05-16 Thread Cesare Di Mauro
2016-05-16 17:55 GMT+02:00 Meador Inge : > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Cesare Di Mauro < > cesare.di.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Just one thing that comes to my mind: is the stack depth calculation >> routine changed? It was suboptimal, and calculating a better number >> decreases stack al

Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, May 16, 2016, 19:02 Ethan Furman wrote: > On 05/16/2016 02:32 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > PEP 519 is now marked as accepted! Two PEPs accepted in one day (Nick > > approved 518 earlier)! > > Excellent! :) > > > If pathlib doesn't get updated in 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 before PyCon it will >

Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Ethan Furman
On 05/16/2016 02:32 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: PEP 519 is now marked as accepted! Two PEPs accepted in one day (Nick approved 518 earlier)! Excellent! :) If pathlib doesn't get updated in 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 before PyCon it will be the first thing I do at the sprints so that it isn't an issue fo

Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, 16 May 2016 at 14:03 Guido van Rossum wrote: > For those following along on the list, it's PEP 519: > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0519/ > > I've read it once more and found nothing worth bickering about, so I am > hereby approving PEP 519. Thanks Brett and Koos for getting this on

Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Guido van Rossum
For those following along on the list, it's PEP 519: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0519/ I've read it once more and found nothing worth bickering about, so I am hereby approving PEP 519. Thanks Brett and Koos for getting this one over the finish line, and congrats! It's been quite an effort

Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, 16 May 2016 at 13:12 Guido van Rossum wrote: > Once you assign yourself a PEP number I'll do one more pass and then I > expect to accept it -- the draft looks good to me! > Done: https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/b41cb718054a > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > >>

Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Guido van Rossum
Once you assign yourself a PEP number I'll do one more pass and then I expect to accept it -- the draft looks good to me! On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > Recent discussions have been about type hints which are orthogonal to the > PEP, so things have seemed to have reached

Re: [Python-Dev] File system path PEP, 3rd draft

2016-05-16 Thread Brett Cannon
Recent discussions have been about type hints which are orthogonal to the PEP, so things have seemed to have reached a steady state. Was there anything else that needed clarification, Guido, or are you ready to pronounce? Or did you want to wait until the language summit? Or did you want to assign

Re: [Python-Dev] Speeding up CPython 5-10%

2016-05-16 Thread Meador Inge
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Cesare Di Mauro wrote: > Just one thing that comes to my mind: is the stack depth calculation > routine changed? It was suboptimal, and calculating a better number > decreases stack allocation, and increases the frame usage. > This is still a problem and came up