On 10/23/2015 4:23 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
2015-10-22 19:02 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon :
It's not specified anywhere; it's just what the peepholer decides to remove.
The exact code can be found at
https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Python/peephole.c . There has
been talk in the past f
"Stéphane Wirtel" writes:
> I would like to understand this part of Python, could you help me?
You should also know the Python Language Reference documentation
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/>, especially the Full Grammar
specification https://docs.python.org/3/reference/grammar.html>.
--
All these overloads makes the code hard to read.
The whole idea of 'i have to know which decorator
got called before the other one' is a smell that
you have too many decorators.
This whole idea reeks 'i can be very, very clever here'.
Laura
___
Python-
I've thought this over and I don't think it's worth it. We need to wait for
a working proposal for multi-dispatch first. Otherwise we'll just end up
having to support this interim syntax *and* whatever the new multi-dispatch
is. Keeping @overload restricted to stub files makes it much more tractabl
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 19:51, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Gregory P. Smith
> wrote:
> >> What would it Foo.__getitem__.__annotations__ contain in this situation?
> >> It'd unfortunately be an empty dict if im
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> So my question is, the byte code generator removes the unused functions,
> variables etc…, is it right?
>
> Technically the peepholer removes the dead branch, but since the peepholer is
> run on all bytecode you can't avoid it.
IIRC, th
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Raymond Hettinger
> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>> So my question is, the byte code generator removes the unused functions,
>> variables etc…, is it right?
>>
>> Technically the peepholer removes the dead branch, but since
On 22 October 2015 at 19:51, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>> What would it Foo.__getitem__.__annotations__ contain in this situation?
>> It'd unfortunately be an empty dict if implemented in the most trivial
>> fashion rather than a dict conta
Hi all,
Just to understand, we have the Parser/Python.asdl and Grammar/Grammar files.
Which one is used for the AST ?
I would like to understand this part of Python, could you help me?
Thank you
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Thank you for your confirmation,
I am going to read the devguide.
> On 25 oct. 2015, at 7:50 PM, Raymond Hettinger
> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Oct 25, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Raymond Hettinger
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
>>> So my question is, the byte cod
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-10-16 - 2015-10-23)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open5181 (+29)
closed 32043 (+17)
total 37224 (+46)
Open issues wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
