And a few comments on the patch ( I have not idea how to patch a patch...)
Is there a branch somewhere with this patch applied?
I'm going through PEP 7, and cleaned up the docstring a bit:
diff -r 15af4f58d143 Modules/mathmodule.c
--- a/Modules/mathmodule.c Sun May 24 22:27:00 2015 -0700
+++
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I don't think I have permissions to comment on the issue,so I'm posting
> here. If there is a way for me to post to the issue, someone let me know...
You just need to register on the issue tracker. On bugs.python.org,
there is a "register" li
I don't think I have permissions to comment on the issue,so I'm posting
here. If there is a way for me to post to the issue, someone let me know...
In the issue (http://bugs.python.org/issue24270) Tal wrote
"""
I have a question regarding complex values. The code (from Chris Barker)
doesn't suppo
On 05/24/2015 06:01 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Additional Q. What does this mean for buildbots? Will they immediately
pick up the new branch?
I don't know about "immediately", but yes the buildbots should get
configured to point at the 3.5 branch, preferably soon.
//arry/
_
In article <20150525001522.GA30305@piedra>,
Zero Piraeus wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 04:39:00PM -0700, Larry Hastings wrote:
> > You can find Python 3.5.0b1 here:
> >https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-350b1/
> Source tarballs (both .tgz and .tar.xz) are missing ...
They see
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
> I've now pushed the 3.5.0 beta 1 release-engineering checkins to
> hg.python.org. At the same time I did this, I also created the 3.5 branch.
>
> Quick FAQ:
Additional Q. What does this mean for buildbots? Will they immediately
pick up the
:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 04:39:00PM -0700, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> You can find Python 3.5.0b1 here:
>
>https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-350b1/
Source tarballs (both .tgz and .tar.xz) are missing ...
-[]z.
--
Zero Piraeus: vive ut vivas
http://etiol.net/pubkey.asc
On May 24, 2015 4:52 PM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
>
>
> On 25 May 2015 07:26, "Guido van Rossum" wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Eric Snow
wrote:
> >> If you still think that's not enough justification then we can table
__definition_order__ for now.
> >
> >
> > Let's table it. It's
I've now pushed the 3.5.0 beta 1 release-engineering checkins to
hg.python.org. At the same time I did this, I also created the 3.5 branch.
Quick FAQ:
Q: Where should I check in bugfixes for 3.5?
A: In the "3.5" branch. You should also merge them forward into "default".
Q: Where should I
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.5 release
team, I'm pleased to announce the availability of Python 3.5.0b1.
Python 3.5 has now entered "feature freeze". By default new features may
no longer be added to Python 3.5. (However, there are a handful of
features tha
Please post your idea to the python-ideas list.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-arc
On 25 May 2015 07:26, "Guido van Rossum" wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Eric Snow
wrote:
>>
>> My premise for storing the definition order on the class is that Guido
was okay with using OrderedDict for cls.__dict__, which is a bigger
change. Regardless, there are two reasons why it
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Eric Snow
wrote:
> On May 24, 2015 3:35 AM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
> > Is it specifically necessary to save the order by default? Metaclasses
> > would be able to access the ordered namespace in their __new__ method
> > regardless, and for 3.6, I still like the _
On May 24, 2015 3:35 AM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
> Is it specifically necessary to save the order by default? Metaclasses
> would be able to access the ordered namespace in their __new__ method
> regardless, and for 3.6, I still like the __init_subclass__ hook idea
> proposed in PEP 487, which inclu
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Tal Einat wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
> > What do folks think about adding one to cmath as well, while we are at
> it?
> > It should be pretty straightforward -- I could focus what time I have to
> do
> > that.
>
> I prefer fo
Hi,
1. The problem
For now, when you want to write a log message, you concatenate the data
from your context to generate a string: In fact, you convert your
structured data to a string.
When a sysadmin needs to debug your logs when something is wrong, he must
write regular expressions to extract
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
> What do folks think about adding one to cmath as well, while we are at it?
> It should be pretty straightforward -- I could focus what time I have to do
> that.
I prefer focusing on getting math.isclose() in before tackling
cmath.isclose(),
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Tal Einat wrote:
> > I filed http://bugs.python.org/issue24270 to track this, but there's a
> > fair bit of work to be done to integrate the changes into the existing
> > math module's code, tests and documentation.
>
> Done. Patch attached to the issue. Awaiting
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 23 May 2015 at 19:29, Tal Einat wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Berker Peksağ
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> * The C implementation should be in Modules/mathmodule.c
>>> * Tests should be in Lib/test/test_math.py
>>> * Documentation should
On 24 May 2015 at 19:44, Mark Shannon wrote:
> On 24/05/15 10:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> If we leave __definition_order__ out for the time being then, for the
>> vast majority of code, the fact that the ephemeral namespace used to
>> evaluate the class body switched from being a basic dictionary t
On 24/05/15 10:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 May 2015 at 15:53, Eric Snow wrote:
On May 23, 2015 10:47 PM, "Guido van Rossum" wrote:
How will __definition_order__ be set in the case where __prepare__ doesn't
return an OrderedDict? Or where a custom metaclass's __new__ calls its
superclass
On 24 May 2015 at 15:53, Eric Snow wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2015 10:47 PM, "Guido van Rossum" wrote:
>>
>> How will __definition_order__ be set in the case where __prepare__ doesn't
>> return an OrderedDict? Or where a custom metaclass's __new__ calls its
>> superclass's __new__ with a plain dict? (
22 matches
Mail list logo
