On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> OK, so I think there isn't anything we can or should do here. Yes, it's
> possible that type(x).__add__ succeeds but x.__add__ fails. That's how you
> spell descriptor. :-) You could also use a random number generator in
> __getattribube__
OK, so I think there isn't anything we can or should do here. Yes, it's
possible that type(x).__add__ succeeds but x.__add__ fails. That's how you
spell descriptor. :-) You could also use a random number generator in
__getattribube__...
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Eric Snow
wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> (I suppose this new thread is a result of some research you did regarding
> the thread complaining about callable()?)
Yep. :)
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Eric Snow
> wrote:
>>
>> _PyObject_LookupSpecial is used in place of obj.__
(I suppose this new thread is a result of some research you did regarding
the thread complaining about callable()?)
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Eric Snow
wrote:
> _PyObject_LookupSpecial is used in place of obj.__getattribute__ for
> looking up special methods. (As far as I recall it is no
_PyObject_LookupSpecial is used in place of obj.__getattribute__ for
looking up special methods. (As far as I recall it is not exposed in
the stdlib, e.g. inspect.getattr_special.) Correct me if I'm wrong
(please!), but there are two key reasons:
* access to special methods in spite of obj.__ge
On 04/19/2015 01:26 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
Is argument clinic a special case of type annotations? (Quoted and
worded to be provocative, intentionally but not maliciously.)
OK, I know that argument clinic applies to C code and I know that type
annotations apply to Python code. And I know t
On 4/19/2015 1:19 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 08/07/2014 09:41 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
Well! It's rare that the core dev community is so consistent in its
opinion. I still think "nullable" is totally appropriate, but I'll
change it to "allow_none".
(reviving eight-month-old thread)
Greetings.
Can someone review Serhiy's patch for the following issue?
https://bugs.python.org/issue22619
I see Dmitry pinged the issue like 2 months ago, then 1 month later...
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.or
On 08/07/2014 09:41 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
Well! It's rare that the core dev community is so consistent in its
opinion. I still think "nullable" is totally appropriate, but I'll
change it to "allow_none".
(reviving eight-month-old thread)
In case anybody here is still interested in arg
