On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:29:09PM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 08/15/2014 08:08 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
> >is a poor argument (that is, I'm disagreeing with it), since *single*
> >line parens-free with statements are already syntactically a tuple:
> >
> > with spam, eggs, cheese:
On 16 August 2014 03:48, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This feels chatty. I'd like the PEP to call out the specific proposals and
> put the more verbose motivation later.
I realised that some of that history was actually completely
irrelevant now, so I culled a fair bit of it entirely.
> It took me
On 08/15/2014 08:08 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:08:42PM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 08/13/2014 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
(2) Also note that *this is already the case*, since tuples are made by
the commas, not the parentheses. E.g. this succeeds:
# Not a tupl
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:08:42PM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >
> >(2) Also note that *this is already the case*, since tuples are made by
> >the commas, not the parentheses. E.g. this succeeds:
> >
> ># Not a tuple, actually two context managers.
On 08/15/2014 11:08 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>> (2) Also note that *this is already the case*, since tuples are made by
>> the commas, not the parentheses. E.g. this succeeds:
>>
>> # Not a tuple, actually two context managers.
>> with open("/tmp/f
On 08/13/2014 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
(2) Also note that *this is already the case*, since tuples are made by
the commas, not the parentheses. E.g. this succeeds:
# Not a tuple, actually two context managers.
with open("/tmp/foo"), open("/tmp/bar", "w"):
pass
Thanks for proving m
On 08/12/2014 08:38 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[1] Technically not, since it's the comma, not the ( ), which makes a
tuple, but a lot of people don't know that and treat it as if it the
parens were compulsary.
It might as well be, because if there can be a non-tuple way to interpret the comma
2014-08-15 7:50 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan :
> As far as I am aware, that last item poses the only open question,
> with the alternative being to add an "iterbytes" builtin (...)
Do you have examples of use cases for a builtin function? I only found
5 usages of bytes((byte,)) constructor in the standa
2014-08-15 21:54 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
> 15.08.14 08:50, Nick Coghlan написав(ла):
>> * add bytes.zeros() and bytearray.zeros() as a replacement
>
> b'\0' * n and bytearray(b'\0') * n look good replacements to me. No need to
> learn new method. And it works right now.
FYI there is a pending
15.08.14 08:50, Nick Coghlan написав(ла):
* add bytes.zeros() and bytearray.zeros() as a replacement
b'\0' * n and bytearray(b'\0') * n look good replacements to me. No need
to learn new method. And it works right now.
* add bytes.iterbytes(), bytearray.iterbytes() and memoryview.iterbytes(
This feels chatty. I'd like the PEP to call out the specific proposals and
put the more verbose motivation later. It took me a long time to realize
that you don't want to deprecate bytes([1, 2, 3]), but only bytes(3). Also
your mention of bytes.byte() as the counterpart to ord() confused me -- I
th
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2014-08-08 - 2014-08-15)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4602 ( +0)
closed 29371 (+31)
total 33973 (+31)
Open issues wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
