In article <53ab53a7.6050...@jcea.es>, Jesus Cea wrote:
> On 25/06/14 20:35, Ned Deily wrote:
> > The 3.3 branch is open only to security fixes. Please don't backport
> > other patches to there.
> >
> > https://docs.python.org/devguide/devcycle.html#summary
>
> Ned, I am aware. It is a doc-onl
On 26 Jun 2014 01:13, "Serhiy Storchaka" wrote:
>
> 25.06.14 16:29, Victor Stinner написав(ла):
>>
>> 2014-06-25 14:58 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
>>>
>>> Other benefit: patches exposed several bugs in code (mainly errors in
>>> backporting from 3.x).
>>
>>
>> Oh, interesting. Do you have example
On 25/06/14 20:35, Ned Deily wrote:
> The 3.3 branch is open only to security fixes. Please don't backport
> other patches to there.
>
> https://docs.python.org/devguide/devcycle.html#summary
Ned, I am aware. It is a doc-only fix, like fixing a typo or correcting
an incorrect statement. It that
In article <3gz1lk1lykz7...@mail.python.org>,
jesus.cea wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cf156cfb12e7
> changeset: 91398:cf156cfb12e7
> branch: 3.3
> parent: 91384:92d691c3ca00
> user:Jesus Cea
> date:Wed Jun 25 13:05:31 2014 +0200
> summary:
> Closes #208
25.06.14 16:29, Victor Stinner написав(ла):
2014-06-25 14:58 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
Other benefit: patches exposed several bugs in code (mainly errors in
backporting from 3.x).
Oh, interesting. Do you have examples of such bugs?
In posixpath branches for unicode and str should be rever
2014-06-25 14:58 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
> 24.06.14 22:54, Ned Deily написав(ла):
>
>> Benefit:
>> - Fixes documented feature that may be of benefit to users of Python in
>> applications with very limited memory available, although there aren't
>> any open issues from users requesting this (AF
24.06.14 22:54, Ned Deily написав(ла):
Benefit:
- Fixes documented feature that may be of benefit to users of Python in
applications with very limited memory available, although there aren't
any open issues from users requesting this (AFAIK). No benefit to the
overwhelming majority of Python use
25.06.14 00:03, Jim J. Jewett написав(ла):
It would be good to fix the tests (and actual library issues).
Unfortunately, some of the specifically proposed changes (such as
defining and using _unicode instead of unicode within python code)
look to me as though they would trigger problems in the no
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Aye, in this case, I'm in the "officially deprecate the feature" camp.
Definitely preferable to the suggestion to remove the configure flag.
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
h
