On Thu, 15 May 2014 19:14:55 +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 09:40:33 -0500
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > > I view stable buildbots as staying up and testing critical platforms.
> >
> > Would "supported" and "unsupported"
On Thu, 15 May 2014 09:40:33 -0500
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > I view stable buildbots as staying up and testing critical platforms.
>
> Would "supported" and "unsupported" (or "critical" and "optional"?)
> make more sense? "Unstable" suggests
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I view stable buildbots as staying up and testing critical platforms.
Would "supported" and "unsupported" (or "critical" and "optional"?)
make more sense? "Unstable" suggests "broken" to me, not "we don't
really care about these."
S
On Thu May 15 2014 at 10:24:45 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
> > We already have such buildbots, they are in the "unstable" category.
> > You can browse through existing buildbots here:
> > https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/
>
> I can't se
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> We already have such buildbots, they are in the "unstable" category.
> You can browse through existing buildbots here:
> https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/
I can't see how to distinguish "stable" from "unstable" (or to view
just the "unst
On Thu, 15 May 2014 08:20:03 -0500
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Main problem with rare platform support is not breaking it accidentally,
> > since without buildbots we won't know when it's broken. This is why we don't
> > make any promises
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Main problem with rare platform support is not breaking it accidentally,
> since without buildbots we won't know when it's broken. This is why we don't
> make any promises.
Should we (or do we) offer to run (unofficial) buildbots for
mai
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:37 PM, francis wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 06:07 PM, Python tracker wrote:
>>
>> Open issues with patches: 2045
>
>
> Has somebody done a graphic of that data againsttime?
>
You can find some charts here (it's still a work in progress though):
http://bugs.python.org/is
