On 12.04.14 01:55, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 02:01 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
>>
>> I have these style problems with several modules that I am reluctant to
>> use, therefore. I know that I'm pretty alone with that.
>
> You are not alone in that.
Funny not to be alone in being alone in t
On 04/11/2014 02:01 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
I have these style problems with several modules that I am reluctant to
use, therefore. I know that I'm pretty alone with that.
You are not alone in that.
--
~Ethan~
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-
On 11/04/14 21:50, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
first_arg = kwargs.pop('option_1', somedefault)
...
nth_arg = kwargs.pop('option_n', somedefault')
...
Is:
def __init__(self, optio
Actually that was a better idea...
Antony
2014-04-11 13:20 GMT-07:00 Guido van Rossum :
> Did you check your spam folder?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Sorry for the slightly off-topic(?) question but I would like to know how
>> to receive email notificatio
Hi Chris,
On 11/04/14 21:50, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
>
>> Then I rather often see things like this:
>>
>> class someclass(object):
>> # note that there is no comment about argument destruction...
>>
>> def __init__(self, **kwargs):
>>
Nope, the email is correct...
2014-04-11 12:12 GMT-07:00 Brett Cannon :
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Sorry for the slightly off-topic(?) question but I would like to know how
>> to receive email notifications for activity on bugs I've opened on the
>> bug
Did you check your spam folder?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry for the slightly off-topic(?) question but I would like to know how
> to receive email notifications for activity on bugs I've opened on the
> bugs.python.org -- so far I don't receive anything even
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
> Then I rather often see things like this:
>
> class someclass(object):
> # note that there is no comment about argument destruction...
>
> def __init__(self, **kwargs):
> first_arg = kwargs.pop('option_1', somedefault)
>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
> Nope, the email is correct...
>
Then you can try reporting a bug at
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/
>
> 2014-04-11 12:12 GMT-07:00 Brett Cannon :
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> So
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry for the slightly off-topic(?) question but I would like to know how
> to receive email notifications for activity on bugs I've opened on the
> bugs.python.org -- so far I don't receive anything even though I'm on the
> nosy list.
>
Hi,
Sorry for the slightly off-topic(?) question but I would like to know how
to receive email notifications for activity on bugs I've opened on the
bugs.python.org -- so far I don't receive anything even though I'm on the
nosy list.
Thanks,
Antony
___
Py
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 11 April 2014 10:36, Armin Rigo wrote:
>> This would be superficial, but change the perception of CFFI to be "a
>> preprocessor that produces C extension modules".
>
> Thanks, that clarification helps a lot. Does this mean that "API-mode"
>
Thank you too, Tres.
Somehow I had a brain shortcut and forgot that
the dict is locally generated, *because* of the stars.
Good to become adjusted and restarted, sorry about the noise.
ciao - Chris
On 11/04/14 05:48, Tres Seaver wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 10:12 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
>
>> I a
Ah, now I see it.
For some reason, I forgot that the dict is always newly created.
That was really wrong thinking. Sorry!
On 11/04/14 05:47, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're worried about here. Modifying kwds doesn't
> actually modify the dict that was passed in. So are you just
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014, at 5:58, Jakub QB Dorňák wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> writing a threaded application I've been surprised that there is no
> object api for fcntl.flock implementing __enter__() and __exit__()
> methods to be used with 'with' statement.
> I have written one (https://pypi.python.org/pyp
On 4/11/2014 8:58 AM, Jakub QB Dorňák wrote:
writing a threaded application I've been surprised that there is no
object api for fcntl.flock implementing __enter__() and __exit__()
methods to be used with 'with' statement.
Several things have been turned into context managers because someone
f
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2014-04-04 - 2014-04-11)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4567 (+17)
closed 28405 (+29)
total 32972 (+46)
Open issues wit
Hi all,
writing a threaded application I've been surprised that there is no object api
for fcntl.flock implementing __enter__() and __exit__() methods to be used with
'with' statement.
I have written one (https://pypi.python.org/pypi), but I wonder whether this
could get into the Python Standar
On 11 April 2014 10:36, Armin Rigo wrote:
> This would be superficial, but change the perception of CFFI to be "a
> preprocessor that produces C extension modules".
Thanks, that clarification helps a lot. Does this mean that "API-mode"
CFFI is competing with things like swig (which is not used mu
On 11 Apr 2014 05:39, "Armin Rigo" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10 April 2014 22:12, Paul Moore wrote:
> > I agree. I'd like to see a clear explanation of what advantages (and
> > disadvantages!) CFFI gives over ctypes, as well as the plan for
> > inclusion and how the inevitable confusion over whether
Hi,
On 10 April 2014 22:12, Paul Moore wrote:
> I agree. I'd like to see a clear explanation of what advantages (and
> disadvantages!) CFFI gives over ctypes, as well as the plan for
> inclusion and how the inevitable confusion over whether to use ctypes
> or cffi will be handled. (...)
I can't
21 matches
Mail list logo
