On 6 Mar 2014 23:44, "Antoine Pitrou" wrote:
>
> Le 05/03/2014 23:53, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>>
>>
>> __traceback__ wouldn't change [...]
>
>
> Uh, really? If you want to suppress all reference cycles, you *have* to
remove __traceback__.
>
> The problem is to make computation of the traceback summ
Hi,
2014-03-06 16:19 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
> By the way, here is my test script to try to create a lightweight
> traceback object without references to locals:
> https://bitbucket.org/haypo/misc/src/tip/python/suppress_locals.py
>
> It works if there is no chained exception.
I updated my pro
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>
> The PEP currently says:
>
>> Alternative Proposals
>> =
>
>> Discussion on python-ideas brought up the following syntax suggestions::
>
>>value = expr except default if Exception [as e]
>
> This one was rejected becau
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
We might allow the creation of traceback objects, but without any custom
frame objects it is unclear how useful that would be.
When I was implementing Pyrex, I would have found it
very useful to be able to create Traceback objects
without Frames, but only if the Traceback
It's all very old C code that's deeply intertwined with interpreter
internals. Who knows what kind of assumptions are made by some of the C
code consuming frames and tracebacks...
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Xavier Morel wrote:
> On 2014-03-06, at 19:32 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > But in
On 2014-03-06, at 19:32 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
> But inspect is in the stdlib. Surely changing inspect.py is less
> controversial than amending the semantics of frame objects.
I've no idea, I'm just giving a case where I could have used the ability
to create traceback objects even without the
The PEP currently says:
> Alternative Proposals
> =
> Discussion on python-ideas brought up the following syntax suggestions::
>value = expr except default if Exception [as e]
This one was rejected because of the out-of-order evaluation.
Note, however, that the (fart
But having exceptions without '__traceback__' affects not
only the inspect module, but also lots of other code. It
will make harder to write generic error reporting code, as
you'd need to check for __traceback__ first, and then, if
it's None, look for some other, asyncio specific attribute.
I th
On 03/04/2014 06:46 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 03/04/2014 03:59 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I too would like an rc3, especially to see if issue 19021 can be fixed, which
I suspect will hit a lot of people.
I talked to the other guys on the 3.4 team, and we're all willing to do an rc3
this weeke
But inspect is in the stdlib. Surely changing inspect.py is less
controversial than amending the semantics of frame objects.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Xavier Morel wrote:
> On 2014-03-06, at 16:52 , Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > Le 06/03/2014 16:03, Yury Selivanov a écrit :
> >>
> >> On 2014
On 2014-03-06, at 16:52 , Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le 06/03/2014 16:03, Yury Selivanov a écrit :
>>
>> On 2014-03-06, 8:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> Le 05/03/2014 23:53, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
__traceback__ wouldn't change [...]
>>>
>>> Uh, really? If you want to suppress all refer
Le 06/03/2014 16:03, Yury Selivanov a écrit :
On 2014-03-06, 8:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le 05/03/2014 23:53, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
__traceback__ wouldn't change [...]
Uh, really? If you want to suppress all reference cycles, you *have*
to remove __traceback__.
The problem is to make c
2014-03-06 14:42 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> Le 05/03/2014 23:53, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>>
>>
>> __traceback__ wouldn't change [...]
>
>
> Uh, really? If you want to suppress all reference cycles, you *have* to
> remove __traceback__.
>
> The problem is to make computation of the traceback summar
On 2014-03-06, 8:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le 05/03/2014 23:53, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
__traceback__ wouldn't change [...]
Uh, really? If you want to suppress all reference cycles, you *have*
to remove __traceback__.
The problem is to make computation of the traceback summary
lightwei
Le 05/03/2014 23:53, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
__traceback__ wouldn't change [...]
Uh, really? If you want to suppress all reference cycles, you *have* to
remove __traceback__.
The problem is to make computation of the traceback summary lightweight
enough that it doesn't degrade performance i
05.03.14 17:24, kristjan.jonsson написав(ла):
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3b2c28061184
changeset: 89477:3b2c28061184
branch: 3.3
parent: 89475:24d4e52f4f87
user:Kristján Valur Jónsson
date:Wed Mar 05 13:47:57 2014 +
summary:
Make the various iterators' "se
16 matches
Mail list logo
