Steven D'Aprano writes:
> That's a good point, but I think most coders would have a very fuzzy
> idea of the difference between type(obj).__name__ and
> obj.__class__.__name__, and when to use one versus the other.
> Likewise, I think that most of the time it is useful to distinguish
> be
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:30:56AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2013 02:58, "Ethan Furman" wrote:
> >
> > On 12/14/2013 07:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:25:10AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oh, yes, a %T shortcut for "length limited type name
On 16 Dec 2013 02:58, "Ethan Furman" wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2013 07:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:25:10AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, yes, a %T shortcut for "length limited type name of the supplied
>>> object" would be brilliant. We need this frequently for
On 12/14/2013 07:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:25:10AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Oh, yes, a %T shortcut for "length limited type name of the supplied
object" would be brilliant. We need this frequently for C level error
messages, and I almost always have to look at a
