Re: [Python-Dev] Validating SSL By Default (aka Including a Cert Bundle in CPython)

2013-06-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2013/6/2 Donald Stufft : > As of right now, as far as I can tell, Python does not validate HTTPS > certificates by default. As far as I can tell this is because there is no > guaranteed certificates available. > > So I would like to propose that CPython adopt the Mozilla SSL certificate > list and

Re: [Python-Dev] Validating SSL By Default (aka Including a Cert Bundle in CPython)

2013-06-02 Thread Chris Rebert
On Jun 2, 2013 10:22 PM, "Donald Stufft" wrote: > > As of right now, as far as I can tell, Python does not validate HTTPS > certificates by default. As far as I can tell this is because there is no > guaranteed certificates available. Relevant: http://bugs.python.org/issue13647 > So I would li

[Python-Dev] Validating SSL By Default (aka Including a Cert Bundle in CPython)

2013-06-02 Thread Donald Stufft
As of right now, as far as I can tell, Python does not validate HTTPS certificates by default. As far as I can tell this is because there is no guaranteed certificates available. So I would like to propose that CPython adopt the Mozilla SSL certificate list and include it in core, and switch ov

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 442: Safe object finalization

2013-06-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2013/5/18 Antoine Pitrou : > > Hello, > > I would like to submit the following PEP for discussion and evaluation. Will the API of the gc module be at all affected? I assume nothing will just be printed for DEBUG_UNCOLLECTABLE. Maybe there should be a way to discover when a cycle is resurrected?

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 442: Safe object finalization

2013-06-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2013/5/18 Antoine Pitrou : > Calling finalizers only once is fine with me, but it would be a change > in behaviour; I don't know if it may break existing code. I agree with Armin that this is better behavior. (Mostly significantly consistent with weakrefs.) > > (for example, say someone is using

Re: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot

2013-06-02 Thread Dan Stromberg
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno < carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:12:43 +1000 > > From: koobs.free...@gmail.com > > To: python-dev@python.org > > Subject: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot

Re: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot

2013-06-02 Thread Carlos Nepomuceno
> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:12:43 +1000 > From: koobs.free...@gmail.com > To: python-dev@python.org > Subject: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot [...] > koobs-freebsd10-amd64 (clang is default here) Does CPython code compiled with clang runs fa

[Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot

2013-06-02 Thread Kubilay Kocak
Afternoon (UTC+10), I'd like to request a new user/pass for a FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT VM guest I've just setup as a dedicated buildbot slave to complement my other koobs-freebsd slaves. Also, with this and future additions to the FreeBSD buildslave set in mind, I think it might also be prudent for a

Re: [Python-Dev] Problem building Python 2.7.5 with separate sysroot

2013-06-02 Thread martin
Quoting Paul Smith : My case may be unusual but even in a more formal cross-compilation environment it's not good to add /usr/include/..., or base such a decision on the behavior of the _build_ system. The offical procedure to cover "unusual" cases is to edit Modules/Setup. If you are not hap