Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Add a reset_name argument to importlib.util.module_to_load in order to

2013-05-31 Thread Brett Cannon
I realize this broke the buildbots. Missed part of a diff in the commit. I'm trying to split a massive CL into reasonable commit sizes, so please be patient. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:11 PM, brett.cannon wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/39cc1b04713e > changeset: 83998:39cc1b04713e > u

Re: [Python-Dev] Problem building Python 2.7.5 with separate sysroot

2013-05-31 Thread Ned Deily
In article <137129.4119.53.camel@homebase>, Paul Smith wrote: > It seems to me (keeping with the theme of this mailing list) that the > add_multiarch_paths() function in setup.py is not right. [...] If you think there is a problem, please open an issue for it on the Python bug tracker: htt

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

2013-05-31 Thread Python tracker
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2013-05-24 - 2013-05-31) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open3997 (+25) closed 25884 (+34) total 29881 (+59) Open issues wit

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - request for pronouncement

2013-05-31 Thread Gustavo Carneiro
Sorry, maybe I am too late to comment on this, but, >>> @singledispatch ... def fun(arg, verbose=False): ... if verbose: ... print("Let me just say,", end=" ") ... print(arg) It is not clear from the PEP (up until the end of the User API section at least) when, if ever,

Re: [Python-Dev] Problem building Python 2.7.5 with separate sysroot

2013-05-31 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 01:21 -0700, Ned Deily wrote: > In article <1369986770.4119.43.camel@homebase>, > Paul Smith wrote: > > > Hi all. I'm trying to build Python 2.7.5 on a GNU/Linux (Linux Mint 14) > > system, but using a different sysroot (that is, a separate > > /usr/include, /usr/lib, etc.

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - request for pronouncement

2013-05-31 Thread Gustavo Carneiro
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Łukasz Langa wrote: > On 31 maj 2013, at 12:18, Gustavo Carneiro wrote: > > > It is not clear from the PEP (up until the end of the User API section > at least) when, if ever, is this implementation of fun ever called. I > mean, what type of 'arg' triggers a di

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - request for pronouncement

2013-05-31 Thread Łukasz Langa
On 31 maj 2013, at 12:18, Gustavo Carneiro wrote: > It is not clear from the PEP (up until the end of the User API section at > least) when, if ever, is this implementation of fun ever called. I mean, > what type of 'arg' triggers a dispatch to this function body? I added a sentence clarifyin

[Python-Dev] PEP 443 - request for pronouncement

2013-05-31 Thread Łukasz Langa
Hello python-dev, PEP 443 is ready for final review. I'm attaching the latest version below for convenience. The full history of changes is available here: http://hg.python.org/peps/log/tip/pep-0443.txt A reference implementation for PEP 443 is available at: http://hg.python.org/features/pep-443/

Re: [Python-Dev] Problem building Python 2.7.5 with separate sysroot

2013-05-31 Thread Ned Deily
In article <1369986770.4119.43.camel@homebase>, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all. I'm trying to build Python 2.7.5 on a GNU/Linux (Linux Mint 14) > system, but using a different sysroot (that is, a separate > /usr/include, /usr/lib, etc., not the real one for my system). This list is for the develop

[Python-Dev] Problem building Python 2.7.5 with separate sysroot

2013-05-31 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. I'm trying to build Python 2.7.5 on a GNU/Linux (Linux Mint 14) system, but using a different sysroot (that is, a separate /usr/include, /usr/lib, etc., not the real one for my system). I have shell script wrappers around GCC and its various tools that invoke it with the right paths to fo

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - Single-dispatch generic functions (including ABC support)

2013-05-31 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 03:05 +0200, Łukasz Langa wrote: >> On 31 maj 2013, at 01:51, Łukasz Langa wrote: >> > >> Back to the point, though. I don't feel we should complicate the >> code, tests and documentation by introducing special handli