On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't know or care much about PyPI metadata, so do what you feel is
> right. If you are uncomfortable being PEP-uncle *and* -author, find
> another author or another uncle. But since it doesn't affect the
> language or library, it's fine
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> In doing the detailed review of PEP 426 as BDFL-Delegate, I keep
> noticing confusing problems with the current spec that mean I want to
> become a *co-author* on the spec, rather than explaining to the
> current authors the aspects I object t
In doing the detailed review of PEP 426 as BDFL-Delegate, I keep
noticing confusing problems with the current spec that mean I want to
become a *co-author* on the spec, rather than explaining to the
current authors the aspects I object to, until they produce a version
that I'm happy with (this is f
I personally agree that huge changesets aren't good. But I can also see
the problem of cross compiling should be sooner or later addressed.
I'm fairly interested in cross building python on android too.
A point to support cross compiling (instead native build arm-on-arm)
could be android doesn
