2012/12/27 Guido van Rossum :
> So just submit a patch to the tracker...
>
> --Guido
>
>
> On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Sven Brauch wrote:
>>
>> 2012/12/27 Nick Coghlan :
>> > It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new
>> > feature, though, so it unfortunately wouldn't be
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:05 PM, serhiy.storchaka
wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/26eb2979465c
> changeset: 81094:26eb2979465c
> branch: 2.7
> parent: 81086:ccbb16719540
> parent: 81090:d3c81ef728ae
> user:Serhiy Storchaka
> date:Thu Dec 27 22:00:12 201
2012/12/27 Serhiy Storchaka :
> четвер 27 грудень 2012 18:24:37 ви написали:
>> It would be great if it could all be killed, but I suppose it might be
>> in some externally maintained module. Which tests?
>
> They are bsddb, sqlite3, ctypes and multiprocessing.
I don't see the point in permuting t
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:24:37 -0600, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
> 2012/12/27 Serhiy Storchaka :
> > I found a code like "if sys.version_info < (2, 4):" in some tests. Should
> > old versions (< 2.6) be supported in tests? Can such support code be removed
> > (note that other tests likely doesn't com
2012/12/27 Serhiy Storchaka :
> I found a code like "if sys.version_info < (2, 4):" in some tests. Should
> old versions (< 2.6) be supported in tests? Can such support code be removed
> (note that other tests likely doesn't compatible with old versions)?
It would be great if it could all be kille
So just submit a patch to the tracker...
--Guido
On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Sven Brauch wrote:
> 2012/12/27 Nick Coghlan >:
> > It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new
> > feature, though, so it unfortunately wouldn't be possible to backport
> > it to any earlier
I found a code like "if sys.version_info < (2, 4):" in some tests.
Should old versions (< 2.6) be supported in tests? Can such support code
be removed (note that other tests likely doesn't compatible with old
versions)?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Pyt
2012/12/27 Nick Coghlan :
> It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new
> feature, though, so it unfortunately wouldn't be possible to backport
> it to any earlier releases.
Yes, that is understandable. It wouldn't be much of a problem tough,
my whole project is pretty bleed
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm writing a static language analyzer for an IDE which reuses the
> CPython parser (for parsing) [1]. Two years ago, I asked about a few
> changes to be made to the AST provided by CPython, but the discussion
> thread dried up befo
Hello!
I'm writing a static language analyzer for an IDE which reuses the
CPython parser (for parsing) [1]. Two years ago, I asked about a few
changes to be made to the AST provided by CPython, but the discussion
thread dried up before a definite decision was made. I decided to just
copy the parse
10 matches
Mail list logo