On 16 September 2012 23:26, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I think all that's needed (at the same level of abstraction) is a method
> write_installed_files(iterable_of_absolute_file_paths) which writes the file.
> This code is already in the distutils2.install_distinfo.install_distinfo.run()
> method. I'll
Paul Moore gmail.com> writes:
> A nice addition would be an API for managing the RECORD file. I would
> imagine functions to read/write the file (hiding the details of how to
> open the CSV file correctly in a cross-platform manner), functions to
> produce a list of the files installed for a dist
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Daniel Holth wrote:
>> I agree with Lennart's and Antoine's advice of just move forward with what
>> we have. If some PEPs need fixing then let's fix them, but we don't need to
>> rock the horse even more by going overboard. Getting the sane, core bits
>> into the
> I agree with Lennart's and Antoine's advice of just move forward with what
> we have. If some PEPs need fixing then let's fix them, but we don't need to
> rock the horse even more by going overboard. Getting the sane, core bits
> into the stdlib as packaging is meant to is plenty to take on. If p
On 14 September 2012 16:12, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I have set up a BitBucket repo called distlib, at
>
> https://bitbucket.org/vinay.sajip/distlib/
>
> This has the following bits of distutils2 / packaging, updated to run on 2.x
> and
> 3.x with a single codebase, and including tests (though not do
On Sep 16, 2012, at 6:37 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> I have set up a BitBucket repo called distlib, at
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/vinay.sajip/distlib/
>>
>> ...
>>
>> The code was taken at around the time packaging was removed, and may n
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I have set up a BitBucket repo called distlib, at
>
> https://bitbucket.org/vinay.sajip/distlib/
>
> ...
>
> The code was taken at around the time packaging was removed, and may not have
> more recent changes.
Would it be possible or make sens
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:54:21 +0200
Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 09/16/2012 06:04 AM, solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
> > results for 1704deb7e6d7 on branch "default"
> >
> >
> > test_dbm leaked [0, 2, 0] references, sum=2
> >
>
> I've noticed that test_dbm
