On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:35 AM, raymond.hettinger
wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b3aeaef6c315
> changeset: 76675:b3aeaef6c315
> user: Raymond Hettinger
> date: Mon Apr 30 14:14:28 2012 -0700
> summary:
> Handle a possible race condition
>
> files:
> Lib/functools.py
On 30.04.2012 18:09, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb ad
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in
> 3.2 and 3.3. I think, it would most visible if you were to use a full
> screen debugger and you will notice that the return call indicator has
> jumped to the next stat
Senthil, if you can shepherd this patch to completion that would be great!
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one
>> of
>> the pdb add-o
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
> the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into the stdlib?
Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in
3.2 and 3.3. I
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>>IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
>>believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
>
> Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adoptin
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
>believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits int
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step
> command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6 months old. A pa
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37:25PM +0200, ezio.melotti wrote:
> range of Unicode whitespace characters.
> -\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equiv. to [^ \t\n\r\f\v].
> +\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equivalent to [^\s].
Is this correct? While I
Hi,
It's not very obvious that printing this page
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ actually prints only
the form. Can you rather offer a downloadable image/pdf.
As an aside, on Chromium, it appears on 2 separate pages, when there's
enough space on the first.
___
On 30Apr2012 09:26, Mark Shannon wrote:
| monotonic is an adjective,
Yes.
| whereas adjusted is (part of) a verb.
No. It is an adjective.
| I think
| both should be adjectives. Does "adjusted" mean that it has been
| adjusted, that it can be adjusted or it will be adjusted?
That depends on
On 29Apr2012 21:31, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
| 2012/4/29 Jim J. Jewett :
| > In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html
| > Benjamin Peterson wrote:
| >
| >> I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named
| >> "is_monotonic" and "is_adjusted". I think the
On 29.04.2012 03:04, victor.stinner wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bd195749c0a2
> changeset: 76599:bd195749c0a2
> user:Victor Stinner
> date:Sun Apr 29 03:01:20 2012 +0200
> summary:
> Issue #14428: Use the new time.perf_counter() and time.process_time()
> functions
Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step
command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6 months old. A patch and test
case have been proposed. The 'Lifecycle of a Patch' at
http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html says
If your patch has not received any notice from review
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/4/29 Jim J. Jewett :
In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named
"is_monotonic" and "is_adjusted". I think the "is_" is unnecessary and
a bit ugly, a
> +- Richard Oudkerk was given push privileges on Apr 29 2012 by Antoine Pitrou
> + on recommendation by Charles-François Natali and Jesse Noller, for various
> + contributions to multiprocessing (and original authorship of
> + multiprocessing's predecessor, the processing package).
Could one o
16 matches
Mail list logo
