On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> IOW, I think it is all fine the way it is. Typically, somebody answers
> quickly. In this case, *two* people answered the same, which
> a) really gets the message through, and
> b) suggests that people are not too tired in actually typing
Martin wrote:
> Does that hold for all versions of the C runtime (i.e. is msvcr80.dll also
> exempt from the ban, or just the version that comes with VS 11)?
Just the VS 11 CRT is allowed.
>
> > So to the extent that Python is just a C program the "port" should be
> > pretty easy and mostly invo
When discussing http://bugs.python.org/issue13734, Charles-François
noted that when os.walk() is called with "followlinks=False", symlinks
to directories are still included in the "subdirs" list rather than
the "files" list.
This seems rather odd to me, so I'm asking here to see if there's a
speci
Am 10.01.2012 18:15, schrieb Matt Joiner:
> I suspect it actually would fix the confusion. "dev" usually means
> development, not "core implementation development". People float past
> looking for dev help... python-dev. Python-list is a bit generic.
There is occasional confusion. More often, peop
Hello.
We are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
developing Python (adding new features to Python itself and fixing bugs);
if you're having problems learning, understanding or using Python, please
find another forum. Probably python-list/comp.lang.python mailing list/
> I haven't been following this thread so maybe this was already
> discussed, but on the whole "new OS target" thing - if people want to
> write immersive apps in Python then there will need to be a new build
> of Python. One thing that might make that easier is the fact that
> the C runtime is st
Am 09.01.2012 07:13, schrieb Jeff Hardy:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> Depending on the extent of removed/disabled functionality, it might not
>> be very interesting to have a Metro port at all.
>
> Win 8 is practically a new OS target - the nt module may need to be
>
On 1/10/2012 12:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I changed the terminology in my latest changeset:
http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/f39d063ab3dd
Important to notice is that the major / minor distinction isn't
relevant in most contexts, while the feature / bugfix distinction is.
Where "major" plays
> It seems that svn.python.org certificate expired today (09/01/2012).
I have now replaced the certificate. The current one will expire on
Chistmas 2013.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:57:03 -0500
Glyph wrote:
>
> Whatever your personal feelings, there is a precedent established in the API:
>
> >>> sys.version_info.major
> 2
> >>> sys.version_info.minor
> 7
> >>> sys.version_info.micro
> 1
>
> This strikes me as the most authoritative definition of the
I suspect it actually would fix the confusion. "dev" usually means
development, not "core implementation development". People float past
looking for dev help... python-dev. Python-list is a bit generic.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Matt Joiner, 10.01.2012 09:40:
>> Per
http://semver.org/
This has made sense since Gentoo days.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:49:04 +
> Rob Cliffe wrote:
>> But "minor version" and "major version" are readily understandable to
>> the general reader, e.g. me, whereas "feature re
On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:49:04 +
> Rob Cliffe wrote:
>> But "minor version" and "major version" are readily understandable to
>> the general reader, e.g. me, whereas "feature release" and "release
>> series" I find are not. Couldn't the f
Hi all,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 07:47, Georg Brandl wrote:
> One of the main reasons for keeping Sphinx compatibility to 0.6.x was to
> enable distributions (like Debian) to build the docs for the Python they ship
> with the version of Sphinx that they ship.
>
> This should now be fine with 1.0.x
You may port the fix to 3.2 and 3.3.
Victor
2012/1/10 raymond.hettinger :
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/068ce5d7f7e7
> changeset: 74320:068ce5d7f7e7
> branch: 2.7
> user: Raymond Hettinger
> date: Tue Jan 10 09:51:51 2012 +
> summary:
> Fix stock symbol for Microso
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:49:04 +
Rob Cliffe wrote:
> But "minor version" and "major version" are readily understandable to
> the general reader, e.g. me, whereas "feature release" and "release
> series" I find are not. Couldn't the first two terms be defined once
> and then used throughout?
Matt Joiner, 10.01.2012 09:40:
> Perhaps the python-dev mailing list should be renamed to python-core.
Well, there *is* a rather visible warning on the list subscription page
that tells people that it's most likely not the list they actually want to
use. If they manage to ignore that, I doubt that
I am out of the office until 01/12/2012.
I will be out of the office Monda through Wednesday with limited access to
email.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Python-Dev Digest,
Vol 102, Issue 26" sent on 1/9/2012 21:05:32.
This is the only notification you will receive while
On Jan 10, 2012, at 09:03 PM, Anthony Kong wrote:
>I don't find 'major' and 'minor' confusing too. Maybe because it is the
>designation used in linux community for years.
Neither do I. I read them as aliases for "leftmost digit" and "middle digit"
respectively, regardless of Python's interpretat
I don't find 'major' and 'minor' confusing too. Maybe because it is the
designation used in linux community for years.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Rob Cliffe wrote:
> But "minor version" and "major version" are readily understandable to the
> general reader, e.g. me, whereas "feature relea
But "minor version" and "major version" are readily understandable to
the general reader, e.g. me, whereas "feature release" and "release
series" I find are not. Couldn't the first two terms be defined once
and then used throughout?
Rob Cliffe
On 10/01/2012 04:05, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/9/2
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:40 AM, charles-francois.natali
wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bf609baff4d3
> changeset: 74315:bf609baff4d3
> user: Charles-François Natali
> date: Mon Jan 09 22:40:02 2012 +0100
> summary:
> Issue #12760: Add a create mode to open(). Patch by
Perhaps the python-dev mailing list should be renamed to python-core.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for hooking into this off-topic thread.
>
> Amaury Forgeot d'Arc, 09.01.2012 19:09:
>> 2012/1/9
>>> I am trying to send a tuple to a method of a python clas
Hi,
sorry for hooking into this off-topic thread.
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc, 09.01.2012 19:09:
> 2012/1/9
>> I am trying to send a tuple to a method of a python class and I got a Run
>> failed from netbeans compiler
>> when I want to send a tuple to a simple method in a module it works,when I
>> want
24 matches
Mail list logo
