On 8/21/2011 8:10 PM, Scott Dial wrote:
On 8/21/2011 3:12 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
But it is not (a behavior bug). Every feature request 'fixes' what its
proposer considers to be a design bug or something.
What's the feature added? That's a semantic game.
Please. It is an operational decisio
Scott Dial writes:
> On 8/21/2011 3:12 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > On 8/21/2011 5:09 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >> I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
> >> branches is that .ico are already out there (since a long time) and
> >> they were currently not recognized. I
On 8/21/2011 3:12 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 8/21/2011 5:09 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
>> branches is that .ico are already out there (since a long time) and
>> they were currently not recognized. I can call it a bug.
>
> But it is
On 8/21/2011 5:09 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
However small the commit was, I think it still was a feature request, so
I wonder if it was appropriate for the stable versions.
Good catch.
I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
branches is that .ico are already out there
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:17, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> However small the commit was, I think it still was a feature request, so
> I wonder if it was appropriate for the stable versions.
I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
branches is that .ico are already
Le 20/08/2011 22:52, Paul Moore a écrit :
> My buildbot seems to have been failing for a while (I've been away on
> holiday) - http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/buildslaves/moore-windows
>
> The failures seem to generally be in distutils and/or packaging. I see
> quite a lot of reds in the waterf
Hi,
However small the commit was, I think it still was a feature request, so
I wonder if it was appropriate for the stable versions.
Regards
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe
