On 7/21/2011 5:44 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
On 22/07/2011 9:02 AM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
Bad logic is get_configured_value! get_configured_value only looks in
the global configuration file if there is a local configuration file
that doesn't have the setting. It should look in the global
configu
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-07-15 - 2011-07-22)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2886 ( +6)
closed 21507 (+33)
total 24393 (+39)
Open issues wit
OK then. I don't have a *strong* opinion against it, just thought that most
people have one version of Python, maybe 2 versions as in 2.x and 3.x, so I
would understand python2.exe, python3.exe but yeah, it's not that big of a
deal either way.
Thank you,
Vlad
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Bria
> >See http://bugs.python.org/issue9260
> >
> >There's a patch there but it needs additional sophistication to remove
> >deadlocks when doing concurrent circular imports.
>
> I don't think that approach can work, as PEP 302 loaders can
> currently assume the global import lock is being held when
At 02:48 PM 7/22/2011 +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
See http://bugs.python.org/issue9260
There's a patch there but it needs additional sophistication to remove
deadlocks when doing concurrent circular imports.
I don't think that approach can work, as PEP 302 loaders can
currently assume the g
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Is it really necessary to hold the import lock for so long?
> Presumably the import lock is there to protect access to
> things like sys.modules. Is that all? Could it be released
> after the module code is loaded and sys.modules has been
> upda
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 20:30, Vlad Riscutia wrote:
> If versioned filenames are added in addition to python.exe, it still might
> look confusing for most users: Why do I have python and python3.2
> executables? What's the difference? I'd rather go with -v argument either
> way, for people that *
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:29:23 +1200
Greg Ewing wrote:
>
> This whole episode seems to have resulted from a collision
> between two rather obscure things: that import statements
> involve locking things, and that some fairly innocuous
> looking calls, such as s.encode('ascii'), can trigger an
> imp
On 22 July 2011 10:29, Greg Ewing wrote:
> The reason for *that* was that my main module was a stub
> that imported the real main module, which did all its
> work directly from the module code. So the whole program
> was effectively running inside an import statement and
> holding onto the import
On 22Jul2011 21:29, Greg Ewing wrote:
[...]
| This whole episode seems to have resulted from a collision
| between two rather obscure things: that import statements
| involve locking things,
Necessary to avoid performing the module definitons twice when a module
is imported twice, surely?
| and
On 22/07/2011 02:30, Vlad Riscutia wrote:
If versioned filenames are added in addition to python.exe, it still
might look confusing for most users: Why do I have python and
python3.2 executables? What's the difference? I'd rather go with -v
argument either way, for people that /know/ they want
I recently encountered a very mysterious bug in which
a background thread would inexplicably hang while attempting
to make a connection using httplib.
Debugging as far as I could at the Python level led to
the surprising conclusion that it was hanging while
using the ascii codec to encode the hos
P.J. Eby wrote:
"from x import y" means "import x; y = x.y".
It actually means slightly more that that if y is a submodule,
in which case it means "import x.y; y = x.y".
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.or
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
The additional confusion lies in the fact that a module can be shadowed
by something which is not a module (a mere global variable). I find it
rather baffling.
I think we're stuck with that as long as we use the same
syntax for importing a submodule and importing a non-mo
14 matches
Mail list logo
