Benjamin Peterson python.org> writes:
>
> 2011/7/6 Nick Coghlan gmail.com>:
> > The API of the resulting object is the same (i.e. they're file-like
> > objects). The behavioural differences are due to cases where the
> > codec-specific classes are currently broken.
>
> Yes, but as we all know
2011/7/6 Nick Coghlan :
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>> 2011/7/6 Victor Stinner :
>>> codecs.open() will be changed to reuse the builtin open() function
>>> (TextIOWrapper).
>>
>> This doesn't strike me as particularly backwards compatible, since
>> you've just en
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2011/7/6 Victor Stinner :
>> codecs.open() will be changed to reuse the builtin open() function
>> (TextIOWrapper).
>
> This doesn't strike me as particularly backwards compatible, since
> you've just enumerated the differences between St
2011/7/6 Victor Stinner :
> codecs.open() will be changed to reuse the builtin open() function
> (TextIOWrapper).
This doesn't strike me as particularly backwards compatible, since
you've just enumerated the differences between StreamWriter/Reader and
TextIOWrapper.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
__
Hi,
Last may, I proposed to deprecate open() function, StreamWriter and
StreamReader classes of the codecs module. I accepted to keep open()
after the discussion on python-dev. Here is a more complete proposition
as a PEP. It is a draft and I expect a lot of comments :)
Victor
--
FWIW, new patches have been attached to the bug report
(http://bugs.python.org/issue12014), one of which is intended to bring
behavior in line with the documentation, and the other of which is
intended to implement Greg Ewing's proposal to allow only identifiers
(or integers) in the arg_name, attri
The C implementation of the PEP 397-compatible Python Launcher for Windows has
come along nicely in the last few days, and now reached a point where it would
benefit from some testing by interested python-dev members. Points of note:
1. As well as source available on
https://bitbucket.org/vinay.s
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:13:58 +0200
Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> > those who are interested can sign up to the diversity list and read/post to
> > the original thread here:
> >
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/private/diversity/2011-July/002509.html
>
> Speaking of "singling out", I've been wonderi
Georg Brandl, 06.07.2011 09:08:
Am 06.07.2011 08:51, schrieb Stefan Behnel:
Georg Brandl, 06.07.2011 07:35:
Well, it was stated that even non-joking use of such words can offend
(the example given was "your argument is blind to (these facts)").
I consider use in jokes to be more serious, since
Am 06.07.2011 08:51, schrieb Stefan Behnel:
> Georg Brandl, 06.07.2011 07:35:
>> Well, it was stated that even non-joking use of such words can offend
>> (the example given was "your argument is blind to (these facts)").
>> I consider use in jokes to be more serious, since it's careless use.
>> Sor
10 matches
Mail list logo
