On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 04:05, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 08:16 +0200, Georg Brandl a écrit :
> > On 06/09/11 02:00, brian.curtin wrote:
> > > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/88e318166eaf
> > > changeset: 70713:88e318166eaf
> > > branch: 3.2
> > > parent: 70700:0aa
On Jun 09, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>I just filed an issue which shows a serious breakage in the marshal module:
>
>"file written using marshal in 3.2 can be read by 2.7, but not 3.2 or 3.3"
>
>http://bugs.python.org/issue12291
>
>Perhaps this issue should be marked as a release block
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> What do you think about deprecating
> abstractproperty, or removing it from the documentation?
Unless anyone specifically howls at the idea, +1 to both (since
abstractproperty doesn't actually achieve the intended purpose and
will become redund
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>> for base in bases:
>>> for name in getattr(base, "__abstractmethods__", ()):
>>> # CHANGE 4: Using rpartition better tolerates weird
>>> naming in the metacl
I just filed an issue which shows a serious breakage in the marshal module:
"file written using marshal in 3.2 can be read by 2.7, but not 3.2 or 3.3"
http://bugs.python.org/issue12291
Perhaps this issue should be marked as a release blocker for 3.2.1 - what do
others (particularly Georg, of cou
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 08:16 +0200, Georg Brandl a écrit :
> On 06/09/11 02:00, brian.curtin wrote:
> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/88e318166eaf
> > changeset: 70713:88e318166eaf
> > branch: 3.2
> > parent: 70700:0aa3064d1cef
> > user:Brian Curtin
> > date:Wed Jun
