On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Supporting detail: I recently installed the latest CentOS, 5.6, and found
> that it still Ships with CPython 2.4.
>
> I installed a CPython 3.2 in /usr/local almost immediately, but I can see
> how some might want 2.4 support yet.
Yeah, this
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Even for Python 2.4, really? Do you really need to support this old
> Python
>
>
> Yes. Many projects distribute packages to folks still using 2.4.
>
Supporting detail: I recently installed the latest CentOS, 5.6, and found
that it still Sh
Hello Pythoneers and Pythonistas,
I'm happy to announce the final release of Python 2.6.7.
Python 2.6 is in security-fix only mode. This means that general bug
maintenance has ended, and only critical security issues are being fixed.
We will support Python 2.6 in security-fix only mode until Oct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2011 06:06 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 juin 2011 17:28:48, eric.araujo a écrit :
>> +packaging
>> +-
>> +
>> +:mod:`distutils` has undergone additions and refactoring under a new name,
>> +:mod:`packaging`, to allow deve
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:40 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I followed up on the tracker. I'm +0 on adding this to 2.6, but not until
>> after the 2.6.7 release on Friday.
>>
>> How well has this change been tested? Are there people for whom this could
>> break things?
>
> As others have pointe
Le vendredi 03 juin 2011 17:28:48, eric.araujo a écrit :
> +packaging
> +-
> +
> +:mod:`distutils` has undergone additions and refactoring under a new name,
> +:mod:`packaging`, to allow developers to break backward compatibility.
> +:mod:`distutils` is still provided in the standard librar
> I followed up on the tracker. I'm +0 on adding this to 2.6, but not until
> after the 2.6.7 release on Friday.
>
> How well has this change been tested? Are there people for whom this could
> break things?
As others have pointed out: it would break systems that don't have the
_ssl module buil
> What should the name of the (seconds, nanoseconds) tuple be?
See my comment: -1 on having such a tuple in the first place.
We have the decimal type to represent arbitrary-precision time stamps.
> st_atim, st_ctim and st_mtim has bee suggested and is what the POSIX
> specification uses. This is
Le 03/06/2011 19:43, Raymond Hettinger a écrit :
> I think the users are better served by links to collections.abc, io.abc, etc.
The specific problem I addressed was that :ref:`abstract-base-classes`
was replaced by “Collections Abstract Base Classes”, which was wrong:
the glossary entry talks abo
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:27 AM, eric.araujo wrote:
>
> Fix reST label for collections ABCs.
>
> The previous markup hijacked the abstract-base-classes glossary entry,
> which resulted in the HTML linking to collections.abc when defining the
> generic ABC concept. Now the glossary links to the abc
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> ..
> What should the name of the (seconds, nanoseconds) tuple be?
> st_atim, st_ctim and st_mtim has bee suggested and is what the POSIX
> specification uses. This is confusingly similar to the existing
> st_atime, st_ctime and st_mtime.
>
S
With regards to http://bugs.python.org/issue11457
What should the name of the (seconds, nanoseconds) tuple be?
st_atim, st_ctim and st_mtim has bee suggested and is what the POSIX
specification uses. This is confusingly similar to the existing
st_atime, st_ctime and st_mtime.
Also, should it be t
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-05-27 - 2011-06-03)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2815 ( +2)
closed 21221 (+56)
total 24036 (+58)
Open issues wit
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 00:15, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 02, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>
>>On 6/2/2011 12:01 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> Bingo. That's why. (Though you are missing some colons in your examples.:-)
>>>
>>> --Guido
>>
>>You operate as a good Python compiler :)
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
