[Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 3.2 rc 3

2011-02-13 Thread Georg Brandl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce the third release candidate of Python 3.2. Python 3.2 is a continuation of the efforts to improve and stabilize the Python 3.x line. Since the final release of Python 2.7, the 2.x line w

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Terry Reedy
On 2/13/2011 5:23 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:11 AM, wrote: Excluding stuff is not hard, seriously. It's not hard to see that wxPython integration doesn't belong in the stdlib. There are more useful aspects of the task to discuss. I think part of the problem is that t

Re: [Python-Dev] Rights on the tracker

2011-02-13 Thread Alexis Métaireau
Le 13/02/2011 23:16, Antoine Pitrou a écrit : > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:47:01 + > Alexis Métaireau wrote: >> >> * Is it possible to give me the rights to edit the reports for the >> distutils2 component ? > > Done. Actually, you have general developer rights, since there doesn't > seem to be a

Re: [Python-Dev] Rights on the tracker

2011-02-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:47:01 + Alexis Métaireau wrote: > > * Is it possible to give me the rights to edit the reports for the > distutils2 component ? Done. Actually, you have general developer rights, since there doesn't seem to be a way (in the GUI) to restrict those to a specific componen

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread James Mills
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > Well, what about it? The virtue of twisted is that even if we haven't all > used it, we've all heard of it. That speaks volumes about its penetration > into the python world. Just a mere suggestion. The fact that this discussion exists means

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Michael Foord
On 13/02/2011 22:24, James Mills wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:11 AM, wrote: On 08:06 pm, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: On 10:46 pm, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:19:06 +1300 Greg Ewing wrote: I was thinking of something

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread James Mills
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:11 AM, wrote: > On 08:06 pm, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: >> >> exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: >>> >>> On 10:46 pm, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:19:06 +1300 > Greg Ewing wrote: I was thinking of something li

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:11 AM, wrote: > > Excluding stuff is not hard, seriously.  It's not hard to see that wxPython > integration doesn't belong in the stdlib.  There are more useful aspects of > the task to discuss. I think part of the problem is that those of us that aren't Twisted users a

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread exarkun
On 08:06 pm, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: On 10:46 pm, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:19:06 +1300 Greg Ewing wrote: I was thinking of something lighter-weight than that. Twisted Core I just had a look at the docs for Twist

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Greg Ewing
exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: On 10:46 pm, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:19:06 +1300 Greg Ewing wrote: I was thinking of something lighter-weight than that. Twisted Core I just had a look at the docs for Twisted Core, and it lists 10 sub-modules. The only on

Re: [Python-Dev] Rights on the tracker

2011-02-13 Thread Alexis Métaireau
Le 13/02/2011 16:12, Éric Araujo a écrit : > Hi, > > I’ve wanted to move our TODO wiki page to the bug tracker for months, > thanks for doing it! Auto-nosy is useful to catch new bugs; for > existing bugs, instead of adding yourself manually to each one and > trigger not-so-useful email, a tracke

Re: [Python-Dev] Rights on the tracker

2011-02-13 Thread Éric Araujo
Hi, I’ve wanted to move our TODO wiki page to the bug tracker for months, thanks for doing it! Auto-nosy is useful to catch new bugs; for existing bugs, instead of adding yourself manually to each one and trigger not-so-useful email, a tracker admin could add you automatically. I’ve asked on htt

Re: [Python-Dev] Rights on the tracker

2011-02-13 Thread Alexis Métaireau
Le 13/02/2011 15:40, Terry Reedy a écrit : > Do you meant that Tarek supports or approves of this? > (Co-opt means something rather different in English.) Sorry, I mean that Tarek approves that :-) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://

Re: [Python-Dev] Rights on the tracker

2011-02-13 Thread Terry Reedy
On 2/13/2011 9:47 AM, Alexis Métaireau wrote: Tarek co-opts this. Do you meant that Tarek supports or approves of this? (Co-opt means something rather different in English.) -- Terry Jan Reedy ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http

[Python-Dev] Rights on the tracker

2011-02-13 Thread Alexis Métaireau
Hi python-devs, I'm currently working on distutils2, and I'm trying to stop having different informations in different places. This means using the bugs.python.org bugtracker, instead of some weird TODO-lists in the bitbucket wiki. Two requests then: * Is it possible to give me the rights to edi

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
> It would then be subject to python-dev development policy rather than > twisted dev policy (which is even stricter!). Would the twisted devs > *really* want that? We could use the same processes we have for > "externally maintained" libraries, but they have without fail caused us > problems.

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Michael Foord
On 13/02/2011 14:23, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:18:52 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: If there is an essential subset of the API that the Twisted devs think would be a suitable replacement for asyncore, while providing a more straightforward migration path into Twisted itself, then

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:18:52 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: > > If there is an essential subset of the API that the Twisted devs think > would be a suitable replacement for asyncore, while providing a more > straightforward migration path into Twisted itself, then it certainly > makes sense to include

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88395 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/asyncore.py

2011-02-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, wrote: >> The desire is there, but it's a hard problem.  There was a similar >> discussion before PyCon 2009, but not much came of it: >> >> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/086678.html > > I started working on a PEP last year, but I didn't g