On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:24:54AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi writes:
>
> > On Linux there's no defined encoding that will work; file names are just
> > bytes to the Linux kernel so based on people's argument that the convention
> > is and should be that filenames are u
Toshio Kuratomi writes:
> On Linux there's no defined encoding that will work; file names are just
> bytes to the Linux kernel so based on people's argument that the convention
> is and should be that filenames are utf-8 and anything else is
> a misconfigured system -- python should mandate th
This broke the buildbots (R. David Murray thinks you may have
forgotten to call super() in the 'payload is None' branch). Are you
getting code reviews and fully running the test suite before
committing? We are in RC.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 16:39, victor.stinner
wrote:
> Author: victor.stinner
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:43 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I also don't see how this could save a lot of memory. As an example
> take a French text with say 10mio code points. This would end up
> appearing in memory as 3 copies on Windows: one copy stored as UCS2 (20MB),
> one as Latin-1 (10MB) and o
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:39 AM, victor.stinner
wrote:
> Author: victor.stinner
> Date: Wed Jan 26 01:39:19 2011
> New Revision: 88197
>
> Log:
> Fix BytesGenerator._handle_text() if the message has no payload (None)
Folks, for the peace of mind of python-checkins watchers, please
remember to me
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> FWIW, I am +0 on consolidating tests under Lib/test. One of the
> reasons that I have not seen mentioned is that it is well-known that
> test package is not part of the official stdlib API and can be
> changes/restructured in backward
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:08:01 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> One change I would propose is that rather than hiding flags in the low
> order bits of the str pointer, we expand the use of the existing
> "state" field to cover the representation information in addition to
> the interning information.
> Some comments would be nice. Right now it looks pretty close to
> deliberately obfuscated code (especially with the call to
> gc.get_referrers()).
That call tries to get at the class dictionary, rather then just
the dict_proxy that you get from A.__dict__. There should be
two referrers to thingy
For the record:
> I also don't see how this could save a lot of memory. As an example
> take a French text with say 10mio code points. This would end up
> appearing in memory as 3 copies on Windows: one copy stored as UCS2 (20MB),
> one as Latin-1 (10MB) and one as UTF-8 (probably around 15MB, de
I'll comment more on this later this week...
>From my first impression, I'm
not too thrilled by the prospect of making the Unicode implementation
more complicated by having three different representations on each
object.
I also don't see how this could save a lot of memory. As an example
take a F
Le mardi 25 janvier 2011 à 20:11 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:00:28 +0100 (CET)
> > benjamin.peterson wrote:
> >> Author: benjamin.peterson
> >> Date: Tue Jan 25 01:00:28 2011
> >> New Revision: 88178
> >>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>.. If we move some modules and not others purely because some
> distros choose not to ship e.g., ctypes and sqlite3
I don't see why this is a problem. Regrtest already has a mechanism
that allows skipping tests based on various criteria. Th
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:00:28 +0100 (CET)
> benjamin.peterson wrote:
>> Author: benjamin.peterson
>> Date: Tue Jan 25 01:00:28 2011
>> New Revision: 88178
>>
>> Log:
>> another pretty crasher served up by pypy
>
> Some comments would be nice
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 17:19, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>> It isn't just unittest, it seems that all *test packages* are in their
>> respective package and not Lib/test except for the json module where Raymond
>> already moved the tests:
>>
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:22:41AM +0100, Xavier Morel wrote:
> On 2011-01-25, at 04:26 , Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > * If you can pick a set of encodings that are valid (utf-8 for Linux and
> > MacOS
>
> HFS+ uses UTF-16 in NFD (actually in an Apple-specific variant of NFD). Right
> here yo
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:51 AM, raymond.hettinger
wrote:
> Author: raymond.hettinger
> Date: Mon Jan 24 02:51:49 2011
> New Revision: 88155
>
> Log:
> Add entries for dis, dbm, and ctypes.
>
>
> Modified:
> python/branches/py3k/Doc/whatsnew/3.2.rst
>
> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Doc/whatsn
On 09:22 am, catch-...@masklinn.net wrote:
On 2011-01-25, at 04:26 , Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* If you can pick a set of encodings that are valid (utf-8 for Linux
and
MacOS
HFS+ uses UTF-16 in NFD (actually in an Apple-specific variant of NFD).
Right here you've already broken Python module
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:00:28 +0100 (CET)
benjamin.peterson wrote:
> Author: benjamin.peterson
> Date: Tue Jan 25 01:00:28 2011
> New Revision: 88178
>
> Log:
> another pretty crasher served up by pypy
Some comments would be nice. Right now it looks pretty close to
deliberately obfuscated code (e
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:17 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> A new function PyUnicode_AsUTF8 is provided to access the UTF-8
> representation. It is thus identical to the existing
> _PyUnicode_AsString, which is removed. The function will compute the
> utf8 representation when first called. Since t
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Earney, Billy C. wrote:
> I want to make it clear that I am in no way associated with the tahoe-lafs
> project. I do not want my email to make that project look bad. That was
> not my intention.
>
Good to know. I was also in a somewhat grumpy mood when I wrote m
On 2011-01-25, at 04:26 , Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> * If you can pick a set of encodings that are valid (utf-8 for Linux and
> MacOS
HFS+ uses UTF-16 in NFD (actually in an Apple-specific variant of NFD). Right
here you've already broken Python modules on OSX.
And as far as I know, Linux soft
As Nick points out, nobody really seems to think this is an
argument against your patch. I'm going to bow out of this thread
after this post, as I'm clearly out of my technical depth.
Victor Stinner writes:
> Le lundi 24 janvier 2011 11:35:22, Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit :
> > ... VFAT-formatt
22 matches
Mail list logo
