> It's an oversight. The changes should be accompanied by version* directives.
> I see you already committed a change for compileall.rst - thanks for that!
> Please feel free to add anything you find missing or submit a bug report and
> assign it to me.
The PEP 3149 commits did not touch Doc, apa
On Dec 16, 2010, at 03:41 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>I noticed that changes related to PEP 3147 and PEP 3149 in Doc haven’t
>been accompanied by versionadded/versionchanged directives.
>
>Is that on purpose, meaning that everyone should be aware of these PEPs
>when reading 3.2 docs, or just an oversi
Hi,
I noticed that changes related to PEP 3147 and PEP 3149 in Doc haven’t
been accompanied by versionadded/versionchanged directives.
Is that on purpose, meaning that everyone should be aware of these PEPs
when reading 3.2 docs, or just an oversight?
Regards
___
> The diff looks good to me.
Committed as r87300, thank you sir!
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.
> Author: lukasz.langa
> New Revision: 87299
>
> Log:
> Broken ConfigParser removed, SafeConfigParser renamed to ConfigParser.
> Life is beatiful once again.
IIIUC, this change makes bugs requesting use of SafeConfigParser in
distutils and logging obsolete.
> @@ -1139,6 +1122,6 @@
>
> if __nam
On 16/12/2010 01:07, Éric Araujo wrote:
-option. Run :program:`python regrtest.py -uall` to turn on all
+option. Run :program:`python -m regrtest -uall` to turn on all
Shouldn't this be `python -m test.regrtest`, or even just `python -m test`?
It should :) I was about to fix just that but then
>> -option. Run :program:`python regrtest.py -uall` to turn on all
>> +option. Run :program:`python -m regrtest -uall` to turn on all
>
> Shouldn't this be `python -m test.regrtest`, or even just `python -m test`?
It should :) I was about to fix just that but then noticed I could
remove more ref
On 16 December 2010 00:23, eric.araujo wrote:
> Author: eric.araujo
> Date: Thu Dec 16 01:23:30 2010
> New Revision: 87296
>
> Log:
> Advertise “python -m” instead of direct filename.
>
>
> Modified:
> python/branches/py3k/Doc/library/test.rst
>
> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Doc/library/test
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:20:54 -0800
Glenn Linderman wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 1:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:58:51 -0800
> > Glenn Linderman wrote:
> >> On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http
On 12/15/2010 1:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:58:51 -0800
Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
for t
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:58:51 -0800
Glenn Linderman wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> > http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
> > for that. Would anyone think it's
On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
for that. Would anyone think it's a bad idea?
(HTTP 1.0 was devised in 1996)
Please address the following co
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> http.server.
+1
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Hello,
I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
for that. Would anyone think it's a bad idea?
(HTTP 1.0 was devised in 1996)
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-Dev
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:53:37 +0100 (CET)
ezio.melotti wrote:
> Author: ezio.melotti
> Date: Wed Dec 15 01:53:37 2010
> New Revision: 87253
>
> Log:
> #363: add automatically release managers to the nosy list for release
> blockers. Initial patch by Georg Brandl.
You should probably add deferr
I know it is late to add features in beta release, but still I thought I
would ask for a little leeway for these issues, especially as they don't
change any API signatures.
http://bugs.python.org/issue3243
Has patch, tests and docs
http://bugs.python.org/issue1508475
I have patch ready and shall
16 matches
Mail list logo
