R. David Murray writes:
> I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. As a relative unicode ignoramus,
> "UCS-2" and "UCS-4" convey almost no information to me, and the bits I
> have heard about them on this list have only confused me.
OK, point taken.
> On the other hand, I understand that 'narrow'
In reviewing my notes from my experimentations with CGIHTTPServer
(Python2.6) and then http.server (Python 3.2a4), I note one behavior I
haven't reported as a bug, nor do I know where to start to figure it
out, other than experimentally.
The experiment: launching CGIHTTPServer without environm
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> Chapter and verse?
Unicode 5.0, Chapter 3, verse C9:
When a process generates a code unit sequence which purports to be
in a Unicode character encoding form, it shall not emit ill-formed
code sequences.
I think anything called "UTF-8 something" is likely
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:04, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:32:42 -0400
> "R. David Murray" wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:22:24 -0200, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel <
> r...@isnomore.net> wrote:
> > >> Am 23.10.2010 19:08, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> > >>> The first 3.2 beta is s
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:59:54 -0800, Glenn Linderman
wrote:
> On 11/21/2010 9:18 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > I want to look at the CGI issue, but I'm not sure when I'll get to it.
>
> Actually, since this code was working before 3.x, and if email.parser
> can now accept binary streams, it see
On 11/21/2010 9:18 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
I want to look at the CGI issue, but I'm not sure when I'll get to it.
Actually, since this code was working before 3.x, and if email.parser
can now accept binary streams, it seems like maybe the only thing that
might be wrong is that presently it
> Author: nick.coghlan
> New Revision: 86633
>
> Issue #10220: Add inspect.getgeneratorstate(). Initial patch by Rodolpho
> Eckhardt
>
> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Doc/library/inspect.rst
> ==
> --- python/branches/p
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> In my opinion, the question is more what was it not fixed in Python2. I
>> suppose
>> that the answer is something ugly like "backward compatibility" or
>> "historical
>> reasons" :-)
>
> No, there was a deliberate decision to not supp
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:17:57 -0800, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2010, at 9:38 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. As a relative unicode ignoramus,
> > "UCS-2" and "UCS-4" convey almost no information to me, and the bits I
> > have heard about them on this
> > I disagree. Python does "conform" to "UTF-16"
>
> I'm sure the codecs do. But the Unicode standard doesn't care about
> the parts of the process, it cares about what it does as a whole.
Chapter and verse?
> Python's internal coding does not conform to UTF-16, and that internal
> coding can
On Nov 21, 2010, at 9:38 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. As a relative unicode ignoramus,
> "UCS-2" and "UCS-4" convey almost no information to me, and the bits I
> have heard about them on this list have only confused me.
>From the users point of view, it doe
Am 21.11.2010 18:27, schrieb Jesus Cea:
> What is the impact in the buildbot architecture?. Slaves must do
> anything?. At least they need to have mercurial installed, I guess.
>
> What, as a buildslave manager, must I do to ready my server for the
> migration?.
Apart from having Mercurial instal
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:55:12 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> > Am 20.11.2010 05:11, schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
> > > "Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> > >
> > > > The term "UCS-2" is a character set that can encode only encode 65536
> > > > characters; it th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is the impact in the buildbot architecture?. Slaves must do
anything?. At least they need to have mercurial installed, I guess.
What, as a buildslave manager, must I do to ready my server for the
migration?.
- --
Jesus Cea Avion
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:52:45 -0800, Glenn Linderman
wrote:
> Sadly, cgi.py input handling seems to depend on the email module,
> thought to be fixed for 3.2, but it is not clear if that has been
> achieved, or if the surrogate encode workaround is sufficient for this.
> More testing needed, b
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> Am 20.11.2010 05:11, schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
> > "Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> >
> > > The term "UCS-2" is a character set that can encode only encode 65536
> > > characters; it thus refers to Unicode 1.1. According to the Unicode
> > > Consortium's FAQ, the
16 matches
Mail list logo