Re: [Python-Dev] Goole Code-In Contest

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Michele Orrù wrote: > I'm a student under 18 years, who really like programming in python. Few > days ago I've found Google Code-In contest, and I'm seriously considering it > as a good opportunity do get more confident with Python. Although I've fixed > a pair of

[Python-Dev] Goole Code-In Contest

Hello. I'm a student under 18 years, who really like programming in python. Few days ago I've found Google Code-In contest, and I'm seriously considering it as a good opportunity do get more confident with Python. Although I've fixed a pair o

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1.3 and 2.7.1 release schedule

Am 23.10.2010 20:56, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > I will also do any future 2.6 release from svn. It does mean that > patches for those release need to make it into svn. I propose that > only the RM have commit to the svn branches after the switch. This is also my thinking. I would like to see a Mercur

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1.3 and 2.7.1 release schedule

I will also do any future 2.6 release from svn. It does mean that patches for those release need to make it into svn. I propose that only the RM have commit to the svn branches after the switch. Sent from my digital lollipop. On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:03 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 22.10.2

Re: [Python-Dev] Multiprocessing maintenance

> Both. Originally the module is/was meant to be officially maintained by > Jesse, as far as I understand. But bugs filed against multiprocessing > have been lingering in the tracker for quite a long time. I personally think we should treat these reports in the same way as all other lingering issu

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1.3 and 2.7.1 release schedule

2010/10/23 "Martin v. Löwis" : > I'm worried about build identification. Either the switchover happens > before RC1, or after Final. I expect significant breakage from the > Mercurial switchover, so that should all be figured out before or after > the release. I hope that can be well tested before

Re: [Python-Dev] Multiprocessing maintenance

> You mean: actively feeling responsible for it? I guess nobody - as for > many other modules in the standard library. > > Or do you mean: who is willing to work on it, in principle? Both. Originally the module is/was meant to be officially maintained by Jesse, as far as I understand. But bugs f

Re: [Python-Dev] Multiprocessing maintenance

> Who is doing multiprocessing maintenance these days? I thought Ask > Solem had been given commit privs for that, but I haven't seen any > activity from him; and Jesse is, mostly, absent. Is anyone working on > the multiprocessing issues? > > (no, I'm not planning to address them :-)) You mean:

Re: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

>> Issues stats: >> open2494 (+32) >> closed 19460 (+110) >> total 21954 (+56) > > The figures in parentheses look wrong. Last week, the stats said: No: they just mean something different that you think. +32 doesn't mean that there are now 32 more open issues than last week, but that

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1.3 and 2.7.1 release schedule

Am 22.10.2010 16:09, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: > 2010/10/22 Dirkjan Ochtman : >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 00:57, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >>> In the interest of getting 3.1.3 and 2.7.1 out by next year, here's a >>> tentative release schedule: >>> >>> November 13th - RC1 >>> November 27th - RC2 >>

Re: [Python-Dev] Bug week-end on the 20th-21st?

Am 23.10.2010 19:08, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > > Hello, > > The first 3.2 beta is scheduled by Georg for November 13th. > What would you think of scheduling a bug week-end one week later, that > is on November 20th and 21st? We would need enough core developers to > be available on #python-dev.

[Python-Dev] Bug week-end on the 20th-21st?

Hello, The first 3.2 beta is scheduled by Georg for November 13th. What would you think of scheduling a bug week-end one week later, that is on November 20th and 21st? We would need enough core developers to be available on #python-dev. Regards Antoine. ___

[Python-Dev] Windows 64 build slave

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:50:49 -0500 Brian Curtin wrote: [...] > > I have a Server 2008 R2 x64 box with the full Visual Studio that I could add > to the buildbot fleet. It's a dual core with 4 GB of RAM, plenty of disk > space, and it runs 24/7. The adventures of http://bugs.python.org/issue9778 s

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Exposing pkguitl's import emulation (was Re: r85538 - python/branches/py3k/Doc/library/pkgutil.rst)

On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:26, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Am 19.10.2010 17:24, schrieb P.J. Eby: >>> Well, my intention at least was that they should be documented and >>> released; it's the documenting part I didn't get around to.  ;-) >>> >>> O

[Python-Dev] Multiprocessing maintenance

Hello everybody, Who is doing multiprocessing maintenance these days? I thought Ask Solem had been given commit privs for that, but I haven't seen any activity from him; and Jesse is, mostly, absent. Is anyone working on the multiprocessing issues? (no, I'm not planning to address them :-)) che