Am 13.10.2010 22:55, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
> I have appointed Antoine Pitrou as the authority/manager
> for which build slave are considered stable. If you want
> to get a certain slave elevated or demoted, you have to
> convince him.
>
> I would also like to ask release managers to take the
On 10/13/10 10:28 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20101014 00:55], Brian Curtin (brian.cur...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Correct. There are a few hacky ways to get Express to use the x64 SDK, or so
>> I
>> read.
>
> I think Martin meant that you wouldn't need VS Express if you install t
-On [20101014 00:55], Brian Curtin (brian.cur...@gmail.com) wrote:
>Correct. There are a few hacky ways to get Express to use the x64 SDK, or so I
>read.
I think Martin meant that you wouldn't need VS Express if you install the
Windows SDK, since it provides all the tools in the SDK to build Pytho
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> Please be aware that Windows poses its own challenges. Often, builds
> or testsuite runs end up with popup windows, which then hang subsequent
> builds. You often get dozens of them to click away. So operating a
> Windows slave is much more tedious than a Unix one.
Fo
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 17:42, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I'll give it a go; I have all the software needed to run the buildbot on
> > it already besides VC Express, which I'm installing now. If ultimately
> > it becomes too much of a pain, I'll go back to just providing the mac.
> > But, I act
On 10/13/10 3:42 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I'll give it a go; I have all the software needed to run the buildbot on
>> it already besides VC Express, which I'm installing now. If ultimately
>> it becomes too much of a pain, I'll go back to just providing the mac.
>> But, I actually have a ves
> I'll give it a go; I have all the software needed to run the buildbot on
> it already besides VC Express, which I'm installing now. If ultimately
> it becomes too much of a pain, I'll go back to just providing the mac.
> But, I actually have a vested interest in upgrading our Python to 64-bit
> i
It looks like this response has slipped under my radar. Sorry.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
[skipped description of two alternative solutions]
..
> For all of the reasons you give above, I think it's a bad idea. :-)
>
I did not give any reason for not having access to t
On 10/13/10 3:14 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 14.10.2010 00:08, schrieb Stephen Hansen:
>> On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
>>> 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
>>
>> Provided its not a prob
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:08:24 -0700
Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
> > 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
>
> Provided its not a problem that its a VM, I have a hefty 64-
Am 14.10.2010 00:08, schrieb Stephen Hansen:
> On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
>> 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
>
> Provided its not a problem that its a VM, I have a hefty 64-bit Win7
> Prof
On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
> 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
Provided its not a problem that its a VM, I have a hefty 64-bit Win7
Professional instance that I can put a buildslave on. Despi
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:55:21 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I have appointed Antoine Pitrou as the authority/manager
> for which build slave are considered stable. If you want
> to get a certain slave elevated or demoted, you have to
> convince him.
Thank you Martin!
I've added a couple of buil
> And, of course, we'd like to get some of these Mac buildbots into the
> "stable" category, so that they are consulted for releases. The
> PPC Leopard and x86 Snow Leopard buildbots look like good candidates.
See the message I just sent: you need to convince Antoine, and
he'll arrange it.
Regar
I have appointed Antoine Pitrou as the authority/manager
for which build slave are considered stable. If you want
to get a certain slave elevated or demoted, you have to
convince him.
I would also like to ask release managers to take the
stable list serious: test failures in a stable slave should
Sorry to drop out like that -- I've been having some email issues.
Stephen, great job; thanks for providing that Snow Leopard buildbot.
I think what we're missing now is an Intel Leopard buildbot. 35%
of Mac users are still running Leopard. I'm running it myself on
some machines, due to the NIS
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:03 +0300
anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
> Is there a public list of annoyances for Python 3 that I can check to
> see if my change is already scheduled for Python 4 and vote for it?
No, there isn't. If you want to know what Python 3 is about, you can :
- read the docs
- rea
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:22 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>>
>> I don't see why such awkward way should be necessary in Python 3k,
>> which breaks backwards compatibility. Why it can't "just work" for my
>> user story?
>
> Because you weren't around advocating and implementing a change when
> Python
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I don't think anyone has ever suggested change for change's sake. If
> they have, I'd love to read the PEP for it.
Not to mention the BDFL's pronouncement message!
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mai
19 matches
Mail list logo
