On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Zac Burns wrote:
> This could be generalized and placed into itertools if we create a function
> (say, apply for lack of a better name at the moment) that takes in an
> iterable and creates new iterables that yield each from the original
> (avoiding the need for a
This could be generalized and placed into itertools if we create a function
(say, apply for lack of a better name at the moment) that takes in an
iterable and creates new iterables that yield each from the original
(avoiding the need for a list) holding only one in memory. Then you could
pass the w
2010/10/10 Antoine Pitrou :
> Personnally, I'm not convinced that a maximum 25% improvement on a
> rather uncommon use case (min() and max() on a sequence of objects
> which take a long time to compare) is a compelling argument for a
> builtin. On the other hand, it would be a rather simple and in
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:54:20 +0300, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
> > (The explanation of the failures applies for all Python versions that
> > I am aware of, but the -m based fix only became available in 2.6)
> > (The impact of various command line options and the PYTHONPATH
> > environment varia
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:57:21 am Paul McGuire wrote:
> Just as an exercise, I wanted to try my hand at adding a function to
> the compiled Python C code. An interesting optimization that I read
> about (where? don't recall) finds the minimum and maximum elements of
> a sequence in a single pass, wi
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:57:21 -0500
"Paul McGuire" wrote:
>
> Any comments? Interest? Should I write up a PEP? Go back to my pyparsing
> hole?
Generally, these things are discussed on python-ideas first. I don't
think a PEP required for a single function, but you'll have to convince
people that
> Any comments?
For 3.2, this is out of scope, because of the moratorium.
For later versions, I'd rather not see a builtin name polluting the
global namespace for this.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pytho
Just as an exercise, I wanted to try my hand at adding a function to the
compiled Python C code. An interesting optimization that I read about
(where? don't recall) finds the minimum and maximum elements of a sequence
in a single pass, with a 25% reduction in number of comparison operations:
- the
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if situation with relative imports in packages is improved in
>> Python 3k or
>> we are still doomed to a chain of hacks?
This is The question. Is Python 3k more friendly to users or require
them to learn the "zen of import" (whi
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if situation with relative imports in packages is improved in
>> Python 3k or we are still doomed to a chain of hacks?
>>
>> My user story:
...
>> PEP 328 http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/ proposes:
>>
>> from ... import c
Can anybody remind me why we don't allow registered tracker users to
link dependent bugs between each other?
--
anatoly t.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pytho
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> If someone wants to throw an issue my way, I can take a look at
>> dumping stdout/stderr from the various test_cmd_line tests (I may not
>> get to it until post-beta1 though).
>
> It's done in r85324.
Even better :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
N
> If someone wants to throw an issue my way, I can take a look at
> dumping stdout/stderr from the various test_cmd_line tests (I may not
> get to it until post-beta1 though).
It's done in r85324.
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-
13 matches
Mail list logo
