Starting around 14:00 UTC today, we will take the trackers at
bugs.python.org, bugs.jython.org, and psf.upfronthosting.co.za offline
for a system upgrade. The outage should not last longer than four hours
(probably much shorter).
Regards,
Martin
___
Pyth
On Feb 14, 2010, at 1:31 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev if it is not
> searchable?
> Recently I needed to find old thread about adding tags to roundup but
> couldn't.
>
> GMane archive doesn't
anatoly techtonik writes:
> What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev if it is not
> searchable?
> Recently I needed to find old thread about adding tags to roundup but
> couldn't.
>
> GMane archive doesn't search -
> http://news.gman
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
>> Yep. Just like I said. So, how about to add Google search form to
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev ?
>
> You'll have to talk to postmas...@python.org about that.
Crossposted. And what
2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
> Yep. Just like I said. So, how about to add Google search form to
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev ?
You'll have to talk to postmas...@python.org about that.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mail
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Benjamin Peterson
>> wrote:
>>> 2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>> 2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
>>> What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev if it is not
>>> searchable?
>>
>> It is:
>>
>> Google "some i
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
>> What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev if it is not
>> searchable?
>
> It is:
>
> Google "some interesting python thing
> site:mail.python.
Le Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:52:23 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
> It's about time for another 3.1 bug fix release. I propose this
> schedule:
>
> March 6: Release Candidate (same day as 2.7a4)
> March 20: 3.1.2 Final release
Looks perfect to me!
Antoine.
__
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>
> Georg Brandl wrote:
> > Am 13.02.2010 13:19, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> >> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
> >>> Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could
could
> >>> report who the pusher was.
> >> This sounds reasonable, as
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 08:31:59PM +0200, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev if it is not
> searchable?
> Recently I needed to find old thread about adding tags to roundup but
> couldn't.
It is sear
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Am 13.02.2010 13:19, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
>> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>>> Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could could
>>> report who the pusher was.
>> This sounds reasonable, assuming it doesn't disclose any private information.
>
2010/2/14 anatoly techtonik :
> What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev if it is not
> searchable?
It is:
Google "some interesting python thing
site:mail.python.org/mailman/pipermail/python-dev"
--
Regards,
Benjamin
_
What is the point in maintaining archive listed in
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev if it is not
searchable?
Recently I needed to find old thread about adding tags to roundup but couldn't.
GMane archive doesn't search -
http://news.gmane.org/navbar.php?group=gmane.comp.python.dev
Am 13.02.2010 18:52, schrieb Dirkjan Ochtman:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:53, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Dirkjan: if you agree to such a strategy, please mention that in the PEP.
>
> Having a pushlog and/or including the pusher in the email sounds like
> a good idea, I'll add something to that
Am 13.02.2010 13:19, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>>
>> Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could could
>> report who the pusher was.
>
> This sounds reasonable, assuming it doesn't disclose any private information.
How could it disclos
16 matches
Mail list logo
