Wasn't there a problem with the spam filter recently?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> "A.M. Kuchling" writes:
>>
>>> The following sites are up again on a new machine, but cannot be
>>> updated through SVN hooks or whateve
On Aug 10, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
"A.M. Kuchling" writes:
The following sites are up again on a new machine, but cannot be
updated through SVN hooks or whatever mechanism:
www.python.org
docs.python.org
www.jython.org
planet.python.org
planet.jython.org
I don't see ‘lists.pyth
"A.M. Kuchling" writes:
> The following sites are up again on a new machine, but cannot be
> updated through SVN hooks or whatever mechanism:
>
> www.python.org
> docs.python.org
> www.jython.org
> planet.python.org
> planet.jython.org
I don't see ‘lists.python.org’ there. Is it affected?
I as
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:29:32 am Dj Gilcrease wrote:
> I figure I would write up the PEP draft, I have never tried writing a
> pep before, but i did read PEP 1 and tried to follow it's formating
> guides. If there are no additions to the idea, then it seems there
> just needs to be a consensus on th
On approximately 8/10/2009 12:12 PM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of Thomas Wouters:
I'm still waiting on a replacement controller, so it wasn't to be today.
Hopefully tomorrow, if the hardware supplier has one in stock. Still no
news on whether we have any chance at all on get
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 22:22, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> The following sites are up again on a new machine, but cannot be
> updated through SVN hooks or whatever mechanism:
>
> www.python.org
> docs.python.org
> www.jython.org
> planet.python.org
> planet.jython.org
>
> svn.python.org was deliberatel
2009/8/10 Nick Coghlan
> Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> > I‘ve had no response to this yet. Is no one using xmlrpc?
>
> It sounds like a reasonable feature to me, but I'm one of those that
> doesn't actually use xmlrpc so my +0 or +1 probably isn't very
> meaningful to you...
Ditto.
_
2009/8/10 Antoine Pitrou :
> Benjamin Peterson python.org> writes:
>>
>> Once Subversion is back up (today, tomorrow?), I will tag the 3.1
>> maintence branch as 3.1.1rc1. The tree will remain frozen until
>> Saturday. If at that time, no one has found something wrong with the
>> RC, I will retag
Benjamin Peterson python.org> writes:
>
> Once Subversion is back up (today, tomorrow?), I will tag the 3.1
> maintence branch as 3.1.1rc1. The tree will remain frozen until
> Saturday. If at that time, no one has found something wrong with the
> RC, I will retag it as the final bugfix release.
Once Subversion is back up (today, tomorrow?), I will tag the 3.1
maintence branch as 3.1.1rc1. The tree will remain frozen until
Saturday. If at that time, no one has found something wrong with the
RC, I will retag it as the final bugfix release.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
I figure I would write up the PEP draft, I have never tried writing a
pep before, but i did read PEP 1 and tried to follow it's formating
guides. If there are no additions to the idea, then it seems there
just needs to be a consensus on the syntax before submitting it to the
peps list
I posted thi
Jim Jewett gmail.com> writes:
>
> In python 3, why does codecs.open even still exist?
I don't remember anyone proposing to deprecate it, so I suppose that's the
(social) reason.
> So at this point, are there any differences beyond:
(c) The built-in open is probably a little more featureful, es
Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> I‘ve had no response to this yet. Is no one using xmlrpc?
It sounds like a reasonable feature to me, but I'm one of those that
doesn't actually use xmlrpc so my +0 or +1 probably isn't very
meaningful to you...
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.
I've had no response to this yet. Is no one using xmlrpc?
To clarify the feature: The xmlrpc server invokes a "dispatch" method on a
dispatcher object (typcillay, just itself) to process xmlrpc requests.
The "path" from the xmlrpc request is not provided. By providing this path, it
becomes pos
14 matches
Mail list logo
