On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:06, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I use that as a branch to tell build slaves to clean out their
> current checkouts. So keep-clone sounds right, assuming it is possible
> to target buildslaves at either clones or branches (which, IIUC, would
> be necessary anyway, since we a
> empty: keep-clone?
I use that as a branch to tell build slaves to clean out their
current checkouts. So keep-clone sounds right, assuming it is possible
to target buildslaves at either clones or branches (which, IIUC, would
be necessary anyway, since we are using a mix of branches and clones).
So PEP 385 proposes to clean up the old branches we still have lying
around in SVN.
This list of branch: action items is what I've come up with to do this
cleanup. Legend first:
- keep-clone means we'll keep that branch in a separate clone
- keep-named means we'll keep that branch as a named bran
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 04:53, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> The diff below should reflect changes from the discussion we had last
> time. Please review. (Some comments may be more appropriate for the
> other threads I just kicked off.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
> Index: pep-0385.txt
>
In my GSoC project, I have implemented asnychronous I/O in subprocess.Popen.
Since the read/write operations are asynchronous, the program may have
already exited by the time one calls the asyncread function I have
implemented. While it returns the data just fine, I have come across an
issue with t
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Vincent Legoll
> wrote:
>>
>> I've fed parts of the stdlib to pylint and after some filtering
>> there appears to be some things that looks strange, I've
>> filled a few bugs to the tracker for them.
>>
>> Is
Heh, wrong dev list 8^). Sorry for the noise.
-Casey
On Aug 3, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Casey Duncan wrote:
Going to the Dr., will be in thereafter.
-Casey
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-d
Going to the Dr., will be in thereafter.
-Casey
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Hello Dirkjan,
Dirkjan Ochtman ochtman.nl> writes:
>
> +As an optional optimization technique, I have performed a reordering pass on
> +the revlogs (internal Mercurial files) resulting from the conversion. In some
> +cases this results in dramatic decreases in on-disk repository size.
Can you
So, I've been not-working on this, which I feel bad about. Suffice it
to say the day job has required more of my time then usual for the
past few weeks. I want to get back into it, so let's start by
re-raising this issue, which Mark Hammond conveniently summarized
below.
> On 4/07/2009 2:03 PM, Ma
The diff below should reflect changes from the discussion we had last
time. Please review. (Some comments may be more appropriate for the
other threads I just kicked off.)
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Index: pep-0385.txt
===
--- pep-0385.txt
11 matches
Mail list logo
