On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Jacob Rus wrote:
> Robert Lehmann wrote:
> > Jacob Rus wrote:
> >> Here is a somewhat more substantively changed version. This one does
> >> away with the 'inited' flag and the 'init' function, which might be
> >> impossible given that their documented (though I wo
Robert Lehmann wrote:
> Jacob Rus wrote:
>> Here is a somewhat more substantively changed version. This one does
>> away with the 'inited' flag and the 'init' function, which might be
>> impossible given that their documented (though I would be extremely
>> surprised if anyone calls them in third-p
Jim Jewett wrote:
> [It may be worth creating a patch; I think most of these comments
> would be better on the bug-tracker.]
I'm going to do that shortly.
> (1) In a few cases, it looked like you were changing parameter names
> between "files" and "filenames". This might break code that was
> c
[It may be worth creating a patch; I think most of these comments
would be better on the bug-tracker.]
(1) In a few cases, it looked like you were changing parameter names
between "files" and "filenames". This might break code that was
calling it with keyword arguments -- as I typically would fo
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've fed parts of the stdlib to pylint and after some filtering
> there appears to be some things that looks strange, I've
> filled a few bugs to the tracker for them.
>
>
>
> Is this useless and taking reviewer's time for nothing
John Machin wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Your post in c.l.py about your re rewrite didn't mention where to report
bugs etc so I dug this address out of Google Groups ...
Environment: Python 2.6.2, Windows XP SP3, your latest (29 July) regex
from the Python bugtracker.
Problem is repeated calls of e.
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:37:18 -0700, Jacob Rus wrote:
> Here is a somewhat more substantively changed version. This one does
> away with the 'inited' flag and the 'init' function, which might be
> impossible given that their documented (though I would be extremely
> surprised if anyone calls them i
2009/8/2 Michael Foord :
[...]
>> In this version, tests would want to call the _init_singleton()
>> function to reset to defaults.
[...]
> Please post the patches to the Python bug tracker:
>
> http://bugs.python.org
>
> Thanks
The patch you post should also patch the test suite to use your
rep
Jacob Rus wrote:
Jacob Rus wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
Jacob Rus wrote:
At the very least, I
think some changes can be made to this code without altering its basic
function, which would clean up the actual mime types it returns,
comment the exceptions to Apache and explain why th
