David Ripton wrote:
> I don't see any point to using Neil's complicated dual-remote git +
> git-svn setup if you don't have commit access.
Good point. I will write another, hopefully simpler, set of
instructions for read-only access.
Neil
___
Pytho
On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
We should probably put these, and the Mercurial information on the
python.org website, perhaps as siblings of the Bazaar information.
Or maybe it should all move to the wiki.
Until we are willing to say these mirrors are not experimental all
I think the better syntax would be to add site:mail.python.org to the
query, but you're right, that doesn't seem to find recent messages.
Maybe the absence of a robots.txt file on mail.python.org could be a
partial explanation?
(Disclaimer: I may work for Google, and Google's first crawler may
hav
Is anyone else having trouble getting the python.org mail archive to
turn up in Google searches for python-dev messages?
I prefer to use that archive rather than one of the multitude of 3rd
party archives when linking posts from PEPs and tracker issues, but for
the last few weeks I've had to go fi
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:32:09PM +0100, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
> I am curious why the following will not work in Python:
>
> class foo(object):
> def bar(self):
> print self.attr
>
> class duck(object):
> attr = 3.14
>
> foo.bar(duck())
Thanks to ever
2009/2/27 Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>
> I should have a PEP (and implementation) ready for alpha 2 to address
> the current discrepancy between contextlib.nested and actual nested with
> statements:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue5251
>
> If you do add a reference to that bug report to the release PEP,
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2009/2/27 Raymond Hettinger :
> You might also want to collect a list of serious changes that you want
> in this release; I know I/O in C is on the list (and without it I
> wouldn't consider it worth releasing) but there may be others. The
> developers of
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 14:19, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> Until we are willing to say these mirrors are not experimental all the
>> instructions should probably go in the wiki.
>>
>
> Where's a go
On 2009.02.27 09:48:17 -0600, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:36:08AM -0600, Brad Miller wrote:
> > when I get to the step git svn fetch I get the following error:
> > zsh-% git svn fetch
> > Permission denied (publickey).
> > Network connection closed unexpectedly: Connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Until we are willing to say these mirrors are not experimental all
the instructions should probably go in the wiki.
Where's a good place for this? I'm thinking three bullets under "Core
Developm
2009/2/27 Raymond Hettinger :
>
>>> > You might also want to collect a list of serious changes that you want
>>> > in this release; I know I/O in C is on the list (and without it I
>>> > wouldn't consider it worth releasing) but there may be others. The
>>> > developers of such features ought to be
> You might also want to collect a list of serious changes that you want
> in this release; I know I/O in C is on the list (and without it I
> wouldn't consider it worth releasing) but there may be others. The
> developers of such features ought to be on board with delivering their
> code before
Benjamin,
> > You might also want to collect a list of serious changes that you want
> > in this release; I know I/O in C is on the list (and without it I
> > wouldn't consider it worth releasing) but there may be others. The
> > developers of such features ought to be on board with delivering the
> I am wondering what to expect next. How long will it be before it is
> applied etc. This is my first attempt to submit a patch to Python.
Unfortunately, it may take any time between a day and five years, see
below.
> Also, does anyone know who the main person is for running changes to the
> c
Ok,
I think I have followed the process and submitted the patch via bug tracker.
I also note that you have made some minor changes to the issue.
The patch is ready for review and feedback. Thanks for your help.
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:52:29PM -0800, st...@inte
I have a patch submitted, with docs changes etc. The patch is to the curses
library module, and adds support for color_set, addchstr, addchnstr,
mvaddchstr, mvaddchnstr, mvwaddchstr, mvwaddchnstr, waddchstr, and
waddchnstr.
I am wondering what to expect next. How long will it be before it is
ap
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:00, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:36:08AM -0600, Brad Miller wrote:
>>
>>> when I get to the step git svn fetch I get the following error:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
>> Is the cron job that's supposed to update the bzr repository still
>> running?
> I think I have this fixed now. The branch updater is running on dinsdale
> now, but I'm currently staggerin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Barry Warsaw
wrote:
This is now done. Please let me know if you have any problems with
the
mirrors.
Is the cron job that's supposed to update the bzr reposit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 27, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:36:08AM -0600, Brad Miller wrote:
when I get to the step git svn fetch I get the following error:
zsh-% git svn fetch
Permission denied (publickey).
Network connectio
Christian> CPython has a stricter policy than most other Python related
Christian> projects.
Indeed. I'd be willing to grant you checkin privileges for SpamBayes simply
because because Christian recognized you and you seem willing to roll up
your sleeves. Do you do Windows?
Skip
_
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009, shashidhar velagandula wrote:
>
> [...]
python-dev is the wrong place for this kind of question, please use
comp.lang.python
In addition, it's not even clear what your question is, please see
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (02/20/09 - 02/27/09)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2363 open (+33) / 14843 closed (+19) / 17206 total (+52)
Open issues with patches: 825
Average
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Chris, are you going to be at Pycon? I'm sorry I haven't had time to
review email package changes. I will try to take a look this weekend,
but if you're going to be at Pycon perhaps we can find some sprinting time?
Sure, I'm around for the whole conference once I'm done g
-- Forwarded message --
From: shashidhar velagandula
Date: Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM
Subject: Fwd: require python rpms for fc8
To: python-dev@python.org
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:38 PM
Subject: require python rpms for fc8
To:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:36:08AM -0600, Brad Miller wrote:
> when I get to the step git svn fetch I get the following error:
> zsh-% git svn fetch
> Permission denied (publickey).
> Network connection closed unexpectedly: Connection closed unexpectedly at
> /opt/local/bin/git-svn line 1385
>
>
when I get to the step git svn fetch I get the following error:
zsh-% git svn fetch
Permission denied (publickey).
Network connection closed unexpectedly: Connection closed unexpectedly at
/opt/local/bin/git-svn line 1385
Is there a prerequisite that I get some kind of ssh key pair setup with th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:08 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
[Chris Withers]
I want to work on these issues:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1823
http://bugs.python.org/issue1874
...and I'd also like to commit the patch I submitted wit
Chris Withers wrote:
> But still, no answer to my original question...
Hey Chris, long time no see!
Your question is covered by the developer FAQ
http://python.org/dev/faq/#how-can-i-become-a-developer. You can get
write privileges by providing a constant flow of good patches.
Eventually you get
Chris Withers wrote:
> But still, no answer to my original question...
Largely, by being patient and waiting :)
As to what you're actually waiting for - usually for an existing
developer to suggest granting you commit privileges. The exact reasons
an existing developer may suggest that are many a
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Being proactive with that package probably means submitting
patches and waiting. When there are active module maintainers,
other contributors (including committers) generally refrain from
committing semantic changes and defer to the package owner
(effbot for ElementTre
[Chris Withers]
Barry usually takes ownership of changes to the email package.
Do you have patches ready for him to review?
Not yet for 1974, but given that I submitted a patch for this issue:
http://bugs.python.org/issue4308
...some months ago, and nothing has happened with it, I want to ge
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
[Chris Withers]
I want to work on these issues:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1823
http://bugs.python.org/issue1874
...and I'd also like to commit the patch I submitted with this one:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1974
Barry usually takes ownership of changes to the em
[Chris Withers]
I want to work on these issues:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1823
http://bugs.python.org/issue1874
...and I'd also like to commit the patch I submitted with this one:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1974
Barry usually takes ownership of changes to the email package.
Do you have p
Hi All,
I want to work on these issues:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1823
http://bugs.python.org/issue1874
...and I'd also like to commit the patch I submitted with this one:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1974
How do I go about getting commit access?
When I do, I take it I work against the vers
35 matches
Mail list logo
