On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 17:53, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva enfoldsystems.com> writes:
>
>> I do have one suggestion for improvement: instead of requiring the
>> person to do this monkey patching, add a new 'log' action to the
>> warnings filter as described by PEP 230
Sidnei da Silva enfoldsystems.com> writes:
> I do have one suggestion for improvement: instead of requiring the
> person to do this monkey patching, add a new 'log' action to the
> warnings filter as described by PEP 230 [1] (see: 'The Warnings
> Filter' section). This way, changing the behavior
Scott David Daniels wrote:
>
> Match the new warning protocol exactly:
> def showwarning(message, category, filename, lineno,
> file=None, line=None):
> ...
> If the line is not None, use it (which will happen if you pass it
> along to showwarning).
> If
Vinay Sajip wrote:
Brett Cannon has suggested [1] that the logging package should provide an
implementation of warnings.showwarning which redirects to logging. Here are my
first thoughts about how this might work:
A new function, showwarning( message, category, filename, lineno[, file]) will
be
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Cannon has suggested [1] that the logging package should provide an
> implementation of warnings.showwarning which redirects to logging. Here are my
> first thoughts about how this might work:
>
> A new function, showwa
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 03:12, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Cannon has suggested [1] that the logging package should provide an
> implementation of warnings.showwarning which redirects to logging. Here are my
> first thoughts about how this might work:
>
> A new function, showwarn
Brett Cannon has suggested [1] that the logging package should provide an
implementation of warnings.showwarning which redirects to logging. Here are my
first thoughts about how this might work:
A new function, showwarning( message, category, filename, lineno[, file]) will
be added to the logging
