> I'm not really a Windows guru so I'm at a loss of even where to begin as
> the Doc\README file doesn't mention how to build .chm files at all.
You need to build the html files, then run prechm.py, then invoke the
HTML Help Workshop.
HTH,
Martin
___
I'm trying to build a Python25.chm file using the source in the Python
2.5.2 tarball.
I'm not really a Windows guru so I'm at a loss of even where to begin as
the Doc\README file doesn't mention how to build .chm files at all.
I've done a number of web searches with things like "how to buil
>> In principle, this is fine with me, so go ahead.
>
> Done.
Thanks for looking into these!
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/option
Aahz wrote:
What do you call Decimal? ;-)
If you're working with decimal numbers, you're more
likely to want a numdigits() method.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscr
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
As for numbits, I think it should be a method
It feels more method-like to me too, because it's something
derived from the int's value rather than an independent
piece of information.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-
[Antoine Pitrou]
> No, but Python is duck-typed and alternate integer classes could adopt such an
> implementation while trying to respect the Python-level long API.
Good point. That makes me feel a little uneasy about adding numbits
at all. Though I guess there are other parts of Python's integ
Mark Dickinson gmail.com> writes:
>
> Right: numbits is only a natural property of a *binary* integer.
>
> On the other hand, I can't realistically see Python ever adopting a
> non power-of-two based implementation.
No, but Python is duck-typed and alternate integer classes could adopt such an
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> As for numbits, I think it should be a method, because while it's
>> very fast for the current implementation of longs, it could be longer
>> to calculate for a long imple
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for numbits, I think it should be a method, because while it's very fast
> for
> the current implementation of longs, it could be longer to calculate for a
> long
> implementation using something other than a power-o
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
>> I would like to apply fixes for some CVE's which are addressed in 2.5 but not
>> yet in 2.4. this would include
>>
>> CVE-2007-4965
>> CVE-2008-1679
>> CVE-2008-1721
>> CVE-2008-2315
>> CVE-2008-3144
>> CVE-2008-1887
>> CVE-2008-4864
>
> Can you identify the revisions t
Greg Ewing canterbury.ac.nz> writes:
>
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> > Math is pretty much float, not int functions.
>
> Also, it's supposed to be confining itself to
> wrapping the C math library.
Too late, because we now have a math.factorial() function.
As for numbits, I think it should be a me
Terry Reedy wrote:
Math is pretty much float, not int functions.
Also, it's supposed to be confining itself to
wrapping the C math library.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
12 matches
Mail list logo
