Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Removal of GIL through refcounting removal.

2008-11-01 Thread Nick Coghlan
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> ... > >> We know it is the plan for PyPy to work in this way, and also that >> Jython and Ironpython works like that (using the host vm's GC), so it >> seems to be somehow agreeable with the python semantics (perhaps not >> really with __del__ but they are not really n

Re: [Python-Dev] [ANN] VPython 0.1

2008-11-01 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:53 AM, J. Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "M.-A. Lemburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [snip] >> BTW: I hope you did not use pybench to get profiles of the opcodes. >> That would most certainly result in good results for pybench, but >> less good ones for general

Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Removal of GIL through refcounting removal.

2008-11-01 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
> ... > > We know it is the plan for PyPy to work in this way, and also that > Jython and Ironpython works like that (using the host vm's GC), so it > seems to be somehow agreeable with the python semantics (perhaps not > really with __del__ but they are not really nice anyway). > PyPy has a semi

Re: [Python-Dev] My patches

2008-11-01 Thread Georg Brandl
Tarek Ziadé schrieb: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> What about having two level of devs ? >>> >>> + core developers + standard library developers >>> >>> [cut] >> >> >> So I'd suggest thinking about developer responsibilities more in terms >> of a