Nick Coghlan wrote:
As Jesse points out, some of that robustness comes from long-standing
bugs in the core getting fixed as a result of the addition of the
multiprocessing unit tests to the standard library test suite.
Not trying to discourage the project, just pointing out that it may not
be as
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> (Note: I'm backporting because the Python 2.6 version appears to be much more
> robust than the 0.52 third-party release.)
As Jesse points out, some of that robustness comes from long-standing
bugs in the core getting fixed as a result of the addition of the
multiprocessing
From: "Doug Hellmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This seems like a large undertaking.
Not necessarily. It can be done incrementally, starting with things like str.split() that almost no one understands completely. It
should be put here and there where it adds some clarity.
I'm sure you're not un
On Oct 16, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
* It will assist pypy style projects and other python
implementations
when they have to build equivalents to CPython.
* Will eliminate confusion about what functions were exactly
intended to
do.
* Will confer
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
* It will assist pypy style projects and other python implementations
when they have to build equivalents to CPython.
* Will eliminate confusion about what functions were exactly intended to
do.
* Will confer benefits similar to test driven development where the
documen
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jesse Noller wrote:
>>
>> Do we want to start a google code project for this given all three of
>> us are interested in this? :)
>
> Do we need (yet) another Google code project? Isn't svn.python.org
> sufficient for our
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Scott Dial
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> * It will assist pypy style projects and other python implementations
>> when they have to build equivalents to CPython.
>>
>> * Will eliminate confusion about what functions were exactly intended
Jesse Noller wrote:
Do we want to start a google code project for this given all three of
us are interested in this? :)
Do we need (yet) another Google code project? Isn't svn.python.org
sufficient for our needs? I'm -0 on a Google code project but I'll give
you my gmail account if you insist
Do we want to start a google code project for this given all three of
us are interested in this? :)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to try backporting the multiprocessing module to Python 2.4. My
>> first
>> probl
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> * It will assist pypy style projects and other python implementations
> when they have to build equivalents to CPython.
>
> * Will eliminate confusion about what functions were exactly intended to
> do.
>
> * Will confer benefits similar to test driven development where
> I had been approached to do the exact same thing, are you trying to
> back port the trunk version (2.6) or py3000?
I'm trying to backport from 2.6. It appears that the buffer stuff is
completely
new though (backported from Python 3.0).
S
___
Python
I'd like to try backporting the multiprocessing module to Python 2.4. My first
problem appears to be the reliance on a complete(?) rewrite of the buffer stuff.
Any clues about transforming this code would be much appreciated.
(Note: I'm backporting because the Python 2.6 version appears to be mu
Also note, for python 2.4/2.5 you are going to *need* the patch to bug
http://bugs.python.org/issue874900
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Skip,
>
> I had been approached to do the exact same thing, are you trying to
> back port the trunk version (2.6)
Hi Skip,
I had been approached to do the exact same thing, are you trying to
back port the trunk version (2.6) or py3000?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Skip Montanaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to try backporting the multiprocessing module to Python 2.4. My
> first
> problem appe
14 matches
Mail list logo