I'm out of town this week for a conference (ICFP/CUFP in Victoria) and
my hotel's connection has been bad enough such that I can't get any
Real Work done so I've managed to hammer on the json library's
decoding quite a bit instead. I just released simplejson 1.9.3 which
improves decoding performanc
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm currently trying to assess the effort required for a CE port. I'm already
> aware of the project at http://pythonce.sourceforge.net, but I find it a
> waste of time to have two separate projects which t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 23, 2008, at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wound up writing a test case for the new C atexit
module
on the py3k branch. A similar test, though different in detail,
makes sense
for the Python atexit module on trunk.
Benjamin Peterson wound up writing a test case for the new C atexit module
on the py3k branch. A similar test, though different in detail, makes sense
for the Python atexit module on trunk. Is this something I can check in or
should I just wait until after 2.6 is released?
def test_badargs(s
> If I remember correctly (and based on a skimming of dictnotes.txt),
> those aren't suggestions, it is documentation about the actual
> implementation and why those decisions were made.
Well, some of the document is written as "if we did X, then we'd see
Y" so it's not always clear. Some parts a
Greetings!
I'm currently trying to assess the effort required for a CE port. I'm already
aware of the project at http://pythonce.sourceforge.net, but I find it a
waste of time to have two separate projects which then require syncing
changes back and forth.
Questions:
- What are the feelings to
